SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 169

ACHAL KUMAR PALIWAL
Bhopal Fracture Hospital – Appellant
Versus
Savitri Devi Vijaywargiya – Respondent


Advocates:
Qasim Ali for applicants.

ORDER

1. With the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finally at motion stage.

2. The present civil revision has been filed under section 115 of CPC against order dated 3.10.2023 passed in RCS No.286-A of 2022, by 7th Civil Judge, Senior Division. Bhopal whereby, petitioners application under section 7 rule 11 CPC has been dismissed.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that learned trial Court has failed to appreciate the fact that the dispute between the parties is prima-facie a commercial dispute as defined under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. Commercial dispute is defined under section 2(1)(c) of Commercial Courts Act. (hereinafter referred as “Act”). From bare perusal of aforesaid provision, it is apparently clear that all the disputes arising out of an agreement for an immovable property used exclusively in trade or commerce is a commercial dispute. It is clear from section 2(1)(c)(vii) of the Act. In the instant case, it is an admitted fact that as per lease dated 1.2.2013, respondent had given suit property on lease to the petitioners for running hospital and allied services. Respondent has valued the suit as Rs.23,25,780/-. and thus, subject matter of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top