Back
AMIT SHARMA
Gaurav Mendiratta – Appellant
Versus
Narcotics Control Bureau – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Amit Sharma, J. The present application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as `CrPC') seeks regular bail in Case No. SC/213/19 arising out of NCB F No. VIII/34/DZU/2018 under Sections 22(c), 23(c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as `NDPS Act') registered by the Narcotics Control Bureau (hereinafter referred to as `NCB'), pending trial before the Court of the learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), Patiala House, New Delhi.
2. The case of the prosecution, as per the complaint dated 27.04.2019, is as under:
i. On 01.11.2018, at 1030 hours, secret information was received at the office of the NCB that a parcel bearing AWB No. 8250438140 is lying at DHL Express Pvt. Ltd. at 71/3, Rama Road, Kirti Nagar, New Delhi and the same is containing a huge quantity of narcotic drug/psychotropic substances. Acting on the said information, a team of NCB reached the aforesaid spot at about 1150 hours. The parcel in question was searched in the presence of two independent witnesses and it lead to a recovery of the following:
The admissibility of evidence, the impact of prolonged incarceration on bail, and the need for substantial evidence to establish allegations.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of liberty and the need to avoid pre-conviction incarceration, balancing the recovery of contraband with the potential innocence of the accused and the impact o....
Prolonged incarceration without conviction violates the constitutional right to a speedy trial, warranting bail for undertrials as per established precedents.
The decision was based on the lack of material indicating the applicant's knowledge of the contraband and the satisfaction of the twin conditions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the impact of delay in trial on the accused's right to liberty, especially in cases governed by stringent bail conditions under special acts like t....
Point of Law : The expression `reasonable grounds' has not been defined in the said Act but means something more than prima facie grounds. It connotes substantial probable causes for believing that t....
The court emphasized strict compliance with procedural safeguards under the NDPS Act, highlighting that significant lapses can undermine the prosecution's case, especially in light of prolonged incar....
Prima facie non-compliance of the second proviso to Section 42(1) of the NDPS Act and the period of incarceration were the main legal points established in the given judgment.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
