IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Vibhu Bakhru, Amit Mahajan, JJ.
Delhi Development Authority & Anr. – Appellants
Versus
Jatinder Kumar Wadhwa & Anr. – Respondents
LPA 722 of 2022 & APPL. 54617 of 2022 & CM APPL. 54618 of 2022
Decided On : 02-08-2023
DDA - Industrial Property Sale - Chapter II of the terms and conditions - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the terms and conditions of the auction, specifically focusing on Clause 9 and 10 in Chapter II of the terms and conditions as set out in the LOI. The court highlighted the conditions related to the deposit of the bid amount, payment timelines, and the consequences of non-compliance. The court also considered the communication and emails exchanged between the parties regarding the payment of interest and the cancellation of the auction sale.
Fact of the Case:
The DDA appealed the judgment that set aside the cancellation of the sale of an industrial property. The dispute arose from the respondents' alleged non-compliance with the auction terms and conditions, specifically regarding the payment timelines and interest payment.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the respondents had complied with the deposit and payment conditions within the stipulated period. The court also noted the communication and emails exchanged between the parties, concluding that the respondents had discharged the consideration payable for the property.
Issues: The issues revolved around the compliance with the auction terms and conditions, particularly regarding the payment timelines and interest payment. The court also addressed the inconsistency in DDA's stand before the learned Single Judge.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the respondents had fulfilled the payment obligations within the extended time period, as indicated in the communication from DDA. The court also emphasized the lack of further communication from DDA within the stipulated period, supporting the respondents' position.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the judgment that set aside the cancellation of the auction sale, based on the respondents' compliance with the payment obligations and the extended time period for making payments.
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. Delhi Development Authority (hereafter `DDA') has filed the present appeal impugning a judgement dated 19.07.2022 (hereafter `the impugned judgment') passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the action of DDA in cancelling the sale of the industrial property (Plot No.86, Block-C, admeasuring 100 sq. mtrs. situated in Mangolpur Industrial Area, Phase-I, hereafter `the property') was set aside. DDA contends that the respondents have not complied with the terms and conditions of the auction and therefore, the Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) paid by the respondents is required to be forfeited.
2. DDA assails the impugned judgment, essentially, on two grounds. First, that the learned Single Judge had disregarded the terms of the auction; and second, that the learned Single Judge had referred to the decision of the Supreme Court in R.K. Saxena v. Delhi Development Authority, (2001) 4 SCC 137, which is inapplicable to the facts of the present case.
2.1. The controversy in this appeal arises in the context of the terms and conditions of the notice inviting tender for sale of the property issued by DDA on 27.09.2020. The terms and conditions of the auction as set out in the said notice, required the prospective bidders to deposit 5% of the bid amount before participating in the e-auction; 20% of the bid amount within seven days from the issuance of the Letter of Intent (hereafter `the LOI') by the competent authority accepting the bid; and the balance 75% of the bid amount within a period of 90 days from the issuance of the demand letter. Clause 9 and 10 in Chapter II of the terms and conditions as set out in the LOI are relevant and the same are set out below:
"9. The demand-cum-allotment letter would be issued to the successful bidder through the BHOOMI Portal after receipt of second stage EMD payment and other requisite documents and verification of second stage EMD. The highest bidder is required to make payment of balance 75% bid amount, as demanded vide said demand letter referred to above, within 90 days from date of issuance of demand letter (without interest/within 270 days from the date of issuance of demand letter (subject to payment of interest on the balance amount @ 10.00% p.a. during the extended period) through payment tab provided in BHOOMI Portal failing which the bid will automatically stand cancelled without any further notice. No extension of time will be granted for payment of 75% of bid amount for period after 270 days from the date of issuance of demand-cum-allotment letter.
Note: The successful bidder may pay the cost of the plot by availing loan facility from financial institutions for which the DDA offer NOC/mortgage permission.
10. In case, the highest bidder fails to deposit the balance 75% amount within the stipulated period, as mentioned in the demand letter, the bid shall automatically stand cancelled and the Earnest Money shall stand forfeited without any further notice. In that eventuality, the Competent Authority shall be competent to re-auction the Industrial plot."
3. In the present case, the respondents complied with the condition of depositing 5% of the bid amount at the time of obtaining the bid documents. They also deposited the balance 25% on 23.11.2020 which was within the stipulated period. Thus, undisputedly, the condition of deposit of the EMD was duly satisfied.
4. On 10.03.2021, DDA issued a letter informing the respondents that the balance amount of Rs.1,35,84,100/- (Rupees One Crore Thirty five Lakhs Eighty four Thousand and One Hundred only) was due and payable by the respondents. The said letter also indicated the time frame as stipulated on the "back side of the letter", which has been reproduced in the impugned judgment. The tabular statement indicating the time frame for making payments and further conditions are set out below:
| Amount payable (75% Bid Amount + interest)/stipulated time frame | ||
| P+0% interest | If paid within 1-90 days from demand letter issuance date | |
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of strict compliance with auction terms and conditions, balanced with the consideration of communications and extensions provided by....
Auction /Bid - Bidders participating in the tender process have no other right except the right to equality and fair treatment in the matter of evaluation of competitive bids offered by interested pe....
Bidders in a tender process must adhere to the terms and conditions outlined in the auction documents; failure to comply justifies cancellation of bids and forfeiture of earnest money.
Claims for interest on wrongfully retained earnest money by public authorities are not subject to special administrative limitation periods. Entities are liable to pay interest on retained funds beyo....
Disputes from e-auction procedures must be resolved through arbitration, as factual disagreements cannot be settled through judicial review.
Bidders must adhere to tender conditions, and failure to comply results in forfeiture of earnest money, as upheld by relevant clauses in the contract.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a vigilant claimant is expected to be aware of policy changes and pursue claims promptly, and failure to avail the benefit of extended time gr....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of adhering to the dispute resolution mechanism provided in the bid document, which in this case, directed the parties to settle ....
The cancellation of allotment was justified due to the petitioner's failure to comply with payment terms, emphasizing the importance of adhering to auction conditions and public interest.
The court ruled that failing to meet a stipulated payment deadline invalidates any claims for extension based on subsequent communications, reinforcing the binding nature of auction terms.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.