SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Ashutosh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Development Authority – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for allotment and time extension (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding cancellation of allotment (Para 4 , 9)
3. court's analysis on payment timelines and entitlements (Para 5 , 8 , 10 , 11)
4. legal basis for time extension in property transactions (Para 7)
5. dismissal of petition and refund options (Para 12 , 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT

Subramonium Prasad, J. (Oral)--The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the Petitioner with the following prayers:

    "a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other similar writ, order or direction of like nature under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, whereby directing the Respondent to issue Allotment Letter qua the allotment of Plot bearing No.S. C-5, New Kondli in favour of the Petitioner;

    b) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other similar writ, order or direction of like nature under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, whereby directing the Respondent to issue No Objection Certificate/Letter of

    c) Grant such other and further relief(s) to the Petitioner as may be found just and proper under the circumstances of the case"

2. The facts, in brief, leading to the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top