SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 3867

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Kamal Kishore Khullar – Appellant
Versus
Sudershan Khanna – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Digvijay, Advocate with Petitioner in person.
None, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. (Oral)

1. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution, impugns the order dated 10.03.2023 passed by ADJ (South), Saket Court, New Delhi (`Trial Court'), in Review Petition No. Misc. DJ 50/2022, titled as Kamal Kishore Khullar v. Sudershan Khanna & Ors., dismissing the review petition filed by the Petitioner seeking setting aside of the impugned judgment and decree dated 26.11.2019, passed by ADJ (South) Saket Court, New Delhi (`Trial Court'), in Civil Suit No. 6882/2016, titled as Sudarshan Khanna & Ors. v. Kamal Kishore Khullar, wherein the suit was partly decreed against the defendant i.e., Petitioner herein.

2. The Petitioner herein was the sole defendant and the Respondents herein was the plaintiff in the civil suit.

2.1. The civil suit was filed by the Respondents initially under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (`CPC') for recovery of Rs. 5 lakhs based on a written agreement dated 20.08.2008 executed between the parties.

2.2. The leave to defend application filed by the Petitioner herein was duly allowed vide order dated 15.10.2011, thereafter, the defendant (i.e., the Petitioner) filed his written statement

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top