SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4063

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Siddharth Mridul, Anish Dayal, JJ.
Ganesh Rathore – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 10661 of 2023, CM APPL. 41332 of 2023 (for interim relief) & CM APPL. 41333 of 2023 (for allowing the long and lengthy synopsis
Decided On : 11-08-2023

Advocates appeared:
Ms. Renu, Mr. Aditya, Mr. Anjani Kr. Mishra, Mr. Kamlesh Kr. Mishra, Mr. Dipak, Mr. Bibhuti Bhushan Misra and Mr. Kailash Kr. Jha, Advocates along with Petitioner in-person.
Ms. Puja Kalra, Standing Counsel, for the Respondent-1/MCD.
Mr. Divyam Nandrajog, Panel Counsel, GNCTD along with Mr. Mayank Kamra, Advocate, for the Respondent-2, 3, 4. & 5.

The court upheld the petitioner's right to vend within the specified zone in compliance with the terms and conditions of the vending certificate.

Headnote:

Vending Certificate - Street Vendors - Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 - Section 3, Section 4, Clause 11 - The court discussed the terms and conditions of the vending certificate issued to the petitioner, the survey conducted by the Town Vending Committee, and the petitioner's right to vend within the designated zone. The court partly allowed the writ petition, directing the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to permit the petitioner to vend within the specified zone, subject to the terms and conditions of the vending certificate.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, to vend at his designated site without illegal interference and in compliance with the vending certificate.

Finding of the Court:

The court partly allowed the writ petition, directing the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to permit the petitioner to vend within the specified zone, subject to the terms and conditions of the vending certificate.

Issues: Interference with vending activities, compliance with vending certificate terms and conditions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the terms and conditions of the vending certificate, the survey conducted by the Town Vending Committee, and the petitioner's right to vend within the designated zone.

Final Decision: The writ petition is partly allowed, and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi is directed to permit the petitioner to vend within the specified zone, subject to the terms and conditions of the vending certificate.

JUDGMENT

Siddharth Mridul, J. (Open Court)--The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, has been instituted on behalf of the petitioner, praying as follows:

    "In the facts and circumstances stated herein above, it is Most Respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:

    I. For an order/Direction to the respondents to let the petitioner vend at his designated vending site without any illegal interference and in compliance with the vending certificate.

    II. For an order directing the respondent authorities to ensure that the petitioner is allowed to peacefully vend at his vending spot at i.e. near Saheed jeet Singh Marg Qutub Institutional Area, South Zone Ward S-67, New Delhi-110067

    III. Pass an order directing the respondents, their officials, their agents etc. be restrained form illegally harassing the petitioner form peacefully vending at the spot.

    IV. Pass an order/direction to the respondents to Decide the representation dated 17.07.2023 marked as ANNEXURE P-2.

    V. Pass the order for compensation of Rs.5 lakhs to the petitioner for the damages caused to him.

    VI. Pass any such directions or order that this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the above-mentioned case."

2. Issue notice.

3. Ms. Puja Kalra, learned Standing Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No. 1/MCD and Mr. Divyam Nandrajog, learned Panel Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent Nos. 2, 3, 4 and5.

4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the MCD, has invited our attention to the terms and conditions, permitting the petitioner to vend.

5. For the sake of completeness, the said terms and conditions attached to the Certificate of Vending, are reproduced herein below:

    "1. Vendor shall not have any other permanent or long-term vending certificate.

    2. Vending certificate is non-transferable.

    3. It is mandatory for the vendor to follow the ending period and zone as determined by TVC or local body.

    4. Vendor shall not give his vending certificate on rent in any way.

    5. Vendor shall not have any infectious disease.

    6. Vendor shall have to take care of hygiene on vending place/zone and nearby area and also take care of public health.

    7. Vendor shall display copy of vending certificate on his place/vending site and will produce original documents to TVC/concerned inspector whenever required.

    8. Vendor/Squatter shall insure that no hindrance be caused to pedestrian and vehicular moment.

    9. Vendor shall not vend/sell any harmful, dangerous and polluted items. It should also be ensured that the quality of the products sold and services provided to the public conform to the prescribed standards of public health, hygienic conditions and safety.

    10. The street vendor shall not do any unauthorized/illegal activity.

    11. Mobile vendors shall not stay or vend more than 30 minutes or time prescribed by the TVC at place in a vending/squatting zone.

    12. Vendors will not block footpaths and will not vend on roads. Vendor should take care of space in front of vending stalls/counters on footpath for pedestrians.

    13. Vending certificate can be cancelled or suspended on the basis of violations.

    14. Vendor shall not build or construct any kind of permanent or temporary structure at vending site.

    15. Seller shall adopt health and hygiene conditions as required by local laws and court orders.

    16. Vendor have to follow all the conditions mentioned in Delhi Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Scheme, 2019."

6. In terms of the Certificate of Vending issued to the petitioner, it is clearly stipulated that he cannot vend from any particular location, contrary to the express terms of Clause no. `11', of the said Certificate of Vending. It is further observed that since the Town Vending Committee (TVC) is yet to fix a time limit, providing for a period, during which vendor can vend from any particular spot, the stipulation of 30 minutes time, contained

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top