SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5094

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Siddharth Mridul, Talwant Singh, JJ.
Mohd. Shabudin – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 6852 of 2023 & CM APPL. 26793 of 2023 (interim relief)
Decided On : 29-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Bhibhti Bhushan Mishra, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Puja Kalra, Standing Counsel, for R-1 along with Mr. Virender Singh, Advocate, for MCD.
Mr. Alok Saxena, Advocate, for R-2 & R-3/GNCTD.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the terms and conditions of the Certificate of Vending under the Delhi Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014.

Headnote:

Street Vending - Certificate of Vending - Delhi Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 - Section 3, Section 4, Clause 11 -

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, requesting the court to direct the respondents to allow him to vend on his designated site without hindrance and to correct the nomenclature in the vending certificate.

Finding of the Court:

The court observed that the petitioner is bound by the terms and conditions of the Certificate of Vending, particularly Clause 11, which limits the time for vending at a particular spot to 30 minutes until the Town Vending Committee (TVC) fixes a time limit. The relief was partly allowed, directing the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to permit the petitioner to vend within the specified zone, subject to the terms and conditions of the certificate of vending.

Issues: The main issue was the petitioner's right to vend on the designated site without hindrance and the interpretation of the terms and conditions of the Certificate of Vending.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the provisions of the Delhi Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, particularly Section 3 (Survey of street vendors and protection from eviction on relocation) and Section 4 (Issue of certificate of vending), to determine the petitioner's rights and limitations as a street vendor.

Final Decision: The court partly allowed the writ petition, directing the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to permit the petitioner to vend within the specified zone, subject to the terms and conditions of the certificate of vending.

JUDGMENT

Siddharth Mridul, J. (Open Court)

1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been instituted on behalf of the petitioner, praying as follows:

    "In the facts and circumstances stated herein above, it is Most Respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:

    I. Pass an Order directing the respondents to ensure that that the petitioner is allowed to peacefully vend on his vending site i.e., on the Footpath, Main Market, Hauz Khas, South Zone, Ward-5-62, Delhi without any hindrance being caused by any public official.

    II. Pass an order directing the respondents, their officials, their agents etc. be restrained from harassing the petitioners from peacefully vending at their vending sites.

    III. Pass an order directing the respondent MCD to correct the nomenclature in the column for vending type from others to stationary street vendor as detailed in the vending certificate issued to the petitioner.

    IV. Pass an order for quashing and setting aside the terms of certificate of vending printed at the back side of the vending certificate to the extent which is not applicable to a stationery street vendor.

    V. Pass any such directions or order that this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the above-mentioned case."

2. Issue notice.

3. Ms. Puja Kalra, learned Additional Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No. 1/MCD and Mr. Alok Saxena, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the MCD, has invited our attention to the terms and conditions, permitting the petitioner to vend.

5. For the sake of completeness, the said terms and conditions attached to the Certificate of Vending, are reproduced herein below:

    "1. Vendor shall not have any other permanent or long-term vending certificate.

    2. Vending certificate is non-transferable.

    3. It is mandatory for the vendor to follow the vending period and zone as determined by TVC or local body.

    4. Vendor shall not give his vending certificate on rent in any way.

    5. Vendor shall not have any infectious disease.

    6. Vendor shall have to take care of hygiene on vending place/zone and nearby area and also take care of public health.

    7. Vendor shall display copy of vending certificate on his place/vending site and will produce original documents to TVC/concerned inspector whenever required.

    8. Vendor/Squatter shall insure that no hindrance be caused to pedestrian and vehicular moment.

    9. Vendor shall not vend/sell any harmful, dangerous and polluted items. It should also be ensured that the quality of the products sold and services provided to the public conform to the prescribed standards of public health, hygienic conditions and safety.

    10. The street vendor shall not do any unauthorized/illegal activity.

    11. Mobile vendors shall not stay or vend more than 30 minutes or time prescribed by the TVC at place in a vending/squatting zone.

    12. Vendors will not block footpaths and will not vend on roads. Vendor should take care of space in front of vending stalls/counters on footpath for pedestrians.

    13. Vending certificate can be cancelled or suspended on the basis of violations.

    14. Vendor shall not build or construct any kind of permanent or temporary structure at vending site.

    15. Seller shall adopt health and hygiene conditions as required by local laws and court orders.

    16. Vendor have to follow all the conditions mentioned in Delhi Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Scheme, 2019."

6. In terms of the Certificate of Vending issued to the petitioner, it is clearly stipulated that he cannot vend from any particular location, contrary to the express terms of Clause no. `11', of the said Certificate of Vending. It is further observed that since the Town Vending Committee (TVC) is yet to fix a time limit, providing for a period, during which a vendor can vend from any particular spot, the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top