VIBHU BAKHRU, AMIT MAHAJAN
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Moorti Devi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. The appellant has filed the present intra court appeal impugning the judgment dated 19.04.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 6119/2013 (hereafter `impugned judgment'). By the impugned judgment, the learned Single Judge had rejected the decision of the Recommendation Committee dated 28.03.2013, whereby the respondent's request for an alternate plot was rejected. The appellant was further directed to reconsider the respondent's application dated 03.06.1988 for grant of an alternate plot on its own merit within a period of twelve weeks.
2. The respondent had filed the writ petition being aggrieved by rejection of her request for allotment of an alternate plot under the scheme to allot alternative plots to the land owners, whose lands were acquired. The said petition was allowed by the impugned judgement.
3. The agricultural land belonging to the respondent was acquired by the appellant. The Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in respect of the agricultural lands owned by the respondent was issued on 27.01.1984. The award for compensation payable for the acquisition of the land was declared on 01.09.1986. The physica
The owner of the land at the time of its acquisition is entitled to apply for an alternate plot under the policy issued by the public notice dated 27.03.1989. Delay in filing the appeal may not be ju....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the application for allotment of alternative land should be made within one year of the receipt of compensation as fixed by the Collector, as ....
A petitioner cannot invoke Article 226 based on an application made 54 years after the initial policy deadline due to gross delay and laches.
Respondents unjustly dismissed the petitioner's application for an alternative plot due to lack of notified requirements, leading the court to quash the decision and remand the case for fresh conside....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the conditions for grant of alternative land under the Scheme of 1961 must be strictly adhered to, and the application for alternative land sh....
Eligibility for alternative plots under land acquisition policies is contingent upon not owning a residential property at the time of acquisition.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner's claim for an alternative plot was allowed based on the finding that the petitioner's land was acquired completely, and the co....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner afresh on the basis of the documents filed by the petitioner in the ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.