Ram Niwas vs Union of India - 2023 Supreme(Del) 2806

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Del) 2806

MINI PUSHKARNA
Ram Niwas – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Charanjit, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Advocate, for the Respondent No.1.
Mr. Ashim Vachher, Standing counsel with Mr. Kunal Lakra, Advocate, for the Respondent/DDA.
Mr. Jatin Yadav, Advocate with Mr. Kaushal Teet Kait, GP for the Respondent/UOI.
Mr. Bilaja Mahapatra with Mr. Rajat Sharma and Mr. Nalin, Advocates, for the Respondent no. 3.

JUDGMENT

[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing]

Mini Pushkarna, J. (Oral)--The present writ petition has been filed with prayer for direction to the respondents to allot alternative plot under the Scheme of Large Scale Acquisition, Development and Disposal of Land in Delhi against the acquisition of the land of the Petitioner.

2. It is the case on behalf of the petitioner that land measuring (0-11) in Khasra No. 116 min out of total land of (114-18) of Sh. Chhajju, father of Petitioner in Village Bawana, Delhi was acquired vide Award No.193/86-87. Subsequently, land measuring (59-16) out of balance unacquired land of Sh. Chhajju was acquired vide Award No.01/1997-98. Father of the petitioner Sh. Chhajju expired on 26.03.1999.

3. Subsequently, vide order dated 12.05.1999, the unacquired land measuring (54-11) was mutated in favour of the petitioner and his four brothers in equal share.

4. It is submitted that the balance unacquired land was also acquired. Thus, land measuring (13-07) of the petitioner and his brothers was acquired on 15.10.2001 vide Award No. 08/2001-2002. Subsequently, land measuring (14-08) of the petitioner and his brothers was acquired on 21.03.2002 vide Award No. 1