SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4033

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Pawan – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
Bail Appln. 2795 of 2023
Decided On : 22-08-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Vivek Kumar Gaurav, Mr. Shubham Prajapati, Mr. Md. Shawez and MR. Archana, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP and Insp. Ranbir Singh, ASI Anand Swaroop, PS Adarsh Nagar, for the Respondent.

Importance of serving notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. in accordance with the law for anticipatory bail.

Headnote:

BAIL APPLICATION - Anticipatory Bail - Notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. - The court directed the IO to serve a notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. in accordance with the law and ordered the petitioner to join the investigation in accordance with the law. If the IO feels the necessity of affecting the arrest, a minimum 3-week notice must be served to the petitioner.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed for anticipatory bail in a case under Section 308/34 IPC, stating that the IO had not served the notice in accordance with Section 41A of Cr.P.C.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the notice served upon the petitioner was not in accordance with the law and directed the IO to serve a notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. in accordance with the law. The petitioner was ordered to join the investigation in accordance with the law.

Issues: Non-compliance with the notice requirements under Section 41-A Cr.P.C.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of following the procedure laid down in the law and directed the IO to serve a notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. in accordance with the law.

Final Decision: The petition for anticipatory bail stands disposed of with the direction for the IO to serve a notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. in accordance with the law and for the petitioner to join the investigation in accordance with the law.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

CRL.M.A. 22498/2023

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

Application stands disposed of.

BAIL APPLN. 2795/2023

1. The present application has been filed seeking grant of anticipatory bail in the case FIR No. 646/2023 under Section 308/34 IPC registered at PS Adarsh Nagar.

2. Learned counsel submits that the offence alleged under Section 308 IPC entails a maximum punishment of 7 years or fine, or both. Learned counsel further submits that IO has not served the notice to petitioner in accordance with Section 41A of Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel further submits that a Coordinate Bench of this court in Amandeep Singh Johar vs. State NCT of Delhi, W.P.(C.) 7608/2017 inter-alia held that police officer should be mandatorily required to issue a notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C in the prescribed format in the manner and in accordance with the terms and procedures contained in chapter 6 of the Cr. P.C..

4. Furthermore, Learned counsel submits that even the model format was also provided in the said judgment. Learned counsel submits that since the formal notice has not been served and the petitioner may be given protection.

5. Learned counsel also submits that he will be satisfied if an appropriate notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. is served upon the petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that he is ready to join the investigation upon service of notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. in accordance with the law.

6. I have perused the notice served upon the petitioner dated 17.08.2023 which is apparently in accordance with Section 41A Cr.P.C and the directions of this court in Amandeep Singh Johar (Supra).

7. Learned APP for the State submits that it was merely a technical flaw and petitioner is intentionally avoiding joining the investigation.

8. I consider the procedure must be followed in the manner it is laid down in the law.

9. It is a matter of grave concern that despite repeated directions, IO in the present case has not served the notice in accordance with the law.

10. Let a notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. be served upon the petitioner in accordance with the law.

11. The petitioner shall join the investigation in accordance with the law. If the IO upon service of notice under Section 41A Cr.P.C. and joining of investigation by the petitioner feels the necessity of affecting the arrest of the petitioner he shall serve a notice of minimum 3 weeks to the petitioner.

12. The petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top