SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4102

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Rajiv Shakdher, Girish Kathpalia, JJ.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1 – Appellant
Versus
M/s Ansal Properties And Infrastructure Limited – Respondent
ITA 453 of 2023
Decided On : 17-08-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr Sanjay Kumar, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Hemlata Rawat and Ms Easha, Advocates, for the Appellant.
None, for the Respondent.

The court has the discretion to condone delay in re-filing appeals and may rely on previous decisions to close appeals.

Headnote:

Condonation of Delay - Income Tax Appeal - The court condoned the delay of 350 days in re-filing the appeal concerning Assessment Year 2012-13. The appeal sought to assail the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and was closed based on the decision of the Court in Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 vs. M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure, 2023:DHC:5443-DB.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant/revenue sought condonation of delay of 350 days in re-filing the appeal concerning Assessment Year 2012-13.

Finding of the Court:

The court granted the condonation of delay and closed the appeal based on the decision in Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 vs. M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure, 2023:DHC:5443-DB.

Issues: Delay in re-filing the appeal, validity of the appeal concerning Assessment Year 2012-13.

Ratio Decidendi: The court exercised its discretion to condone the delay and relied on a previous decision to close the appeal.

Final Decision: The delay in re-filing the appeal was condoned, and the appeal was closed based on the decision in Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 vs. M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure, 2023:DHC:5443-DB.

JUDGMENT

[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral)

CM No.42063/2023 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking condonation of delay of 350 days in re-filing the appeal]

1. This is an application moved on behalf of the appellant/revenue seeking condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal.

2. According to the appellant/revenue, there is a delay of 350 days in re- filing the appeal.

3. For the reasons given in the application, the delay in re-filing the appeal is condoned.

4. Accordingly, the application is disposed of, in the aforesaid terms.

ITA 453/2023

5. This appeal concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13.

6. Via this appeal, the appellant/revenue seeks to assail the order dated 19.11.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short, "Tribunal"].

7. Mr Sanjay Kumar, learned senior standing counsel, who appears on behalf of appellant/revenue, fairly, states that issue raised in the instant appeal is covered by the decision of this Court rendered in Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 vs. M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure, 2023:DHC:5443-DB.

8. Accordingly, the appeal is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top