IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Tara Vitasta Ganju, J.
Sh. Mohinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Satish Chander Sikka – Respondent
RC.REV. 35 of 2023 & CM APPL. 35128 of 2023, CM APPL. 5869 of 2023 and CM APPL. 28815 of 2023
Decided On : 22-08-2023
Affixation of Use and Occupation Charges - Property Dispute - Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd. vs. Federal Motors (P) Ltd. - [2005) 1 SCC 705] - The court discussed the lease deeds, property location, and market rent to determine the use and occupation charges for the demised premises. The court directed the tenant to pay use and occupation charges at a specified rate until the final outcome of the Revision Petition. The interim protection granted was subject to the tenant's timely payment of charges.
Fact of the Case:
The court addressed an application for affixation of use and occupation charges filed by the landlord regarding a shop in a commercial area. The tenant's lease deeds, property location, and market rent were discussed to determine the charges. The court directed the tenant to pay use and occupation charges at a specified rate until the final outcome of the Revision Petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the lease deeds, property location, and market rent were crucial in determining the use and occupation charges for the demised premises. It directed the tenant to make specified payments and granted interim protection subject to timely payment.
Issues: The key issues involved the determination of use and occupation charges for the demised premises based on lease deeds, property location, and market rent, and the grant of interim protection subject to the tenant's payment.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the lease deeds, property location, and market rent in determining the use and occupation charges. It emphasized the importance of timely payment for the grant of interim protection.
Final Decision: The court directed the tenant to pay use and occupation charges at a specified rate until the final outcome of the Revision Petition and granted interim protection subject to timely payment.
JUDGMENT
[Physical Court hearing/ Hybrid hearing (as per request)]
Tara Vitasta Ganju, J. (Oral)
CM APPL. 28815/2023 [Application for affixation of use and occupation charges]
1. This is an Application filed on behalf of the Respondent/landlord for affixation of use and occupation charges qua the shop admeasuring 22-9" x 9'4 1/2 at Ground Floor, Building No.13/33, WEA, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005 [hereinafter referred to as the "demised premises"].
2. It is submitted by the Respondent/Landlord that in terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd. vs. Federal Motors (P) Ltd. reported as (2005) 1 SCC 705, once the Eviction Order has been passed, the tenant is required to pay the use and occupation charges at market rent till the final disposal of the present Revision Petition.
3. Learned Counsel for the parties have filed their respective lease deeds in support of their contentions.
3.1. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has relied on two lease deeds qua the property bearing No.13/39, Situated at W.E.A, Arya Samaj Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005 and property bearing No.10596 (13/13), Ward No. XVI, built on Plot No. 13, in Block No.13, situated at Western Extension area, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005 fetching the monthly rent of Rs. 20,000/- and 31,000/- respectively.
3.2. While the Respondent/landlord has filed a lease deed qua the shop admeasuring 23 sq. ft. (5" x 4.6") nearby the tenanted property i.e. 13/31 W.E.A. Karol Bagh, New Delhi fetching a monthly rent of approx Rs. 1,00,000/- at present.
4. Learned Counsel for the Respondent/landlord submits that the lease deeds relied upon by the Petitioner, i.e., property bearing No.13/39, Situated at W.E.A, Arya Samaj Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005 and property bearing No.10596 (13/13), Ward No. XVI, built on Plot No. 13, in Block No.13, situated at Western Extension area, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005 are distinguishable from the demised premises in as much as they are either inner lanes or do not have the same frontage as the demised premises.
5. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner/tenant also seeks to rely upon a copy of the site plan of the area which has been filed by him to submit that shop admeasuring 23 sq. ft. (5" x 4.6") at a rental of Rs. 85,471/- per month, nearby tenanted property i.e. 13/31 W.E.A. Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005 would be apt for the comparison with the demised premises and it is also on a 60 feet wide road with a large frontage.
5.1. It is further contended that since the demised premises is approx 215 sq. feet, the user charges should be fixed at least Rs.4 lacs per month for the demised premises.
5.2. A coloured copy of the area has been handed over to the Court and also to the learned Counsel for the Respondent/landlord to explain these contentions by learned Counsel for the Respondent/landlord. Registry is directed to scan and upload the coloured copy of the site plan. So that it remains embedded in the case file.
6. The premises is a large shop on the ground floor admeasuring 22-9" x 9'4 1/2 and it is located in the commercial hub of Karol Bagh on the main Arya Samaj Road. The shop is on a 60 feet wide road with ample parking space provided for. The construction of the shop is reasonably in a good condition as well.
7. In these circumstances, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, and with the consent of the parties, the directions below are being passed.
8. The Petitioner/tenant shall pay to the Respondent/landlord use and occupation charges in the following manner during the pendency of the Revision Petition:
(i) The use and occupation charges, for the period from 24.03.2023 to 31.08.2023 shall be paid by the Petitioner/tenant at the rate of Rs. 1.40 lakhs per month;
(ii) The use and occupation charges, for the period from 01.09.2023 onwards shall be paid by the Petitioner/tenant at the rate of Rs. 1.60 lakhs per month on or before 7th day of each calendar month;
9. All payments shall
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of lease deeds, property location, and market rent in determining use and occupation charges, and the requirement of timely paymen....
The main legal point established is the requirement for a tenant to pay use and occupation charges at the market rate of similar premises till the final disposal of the petition, considering the fact....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the tenant is required to pay the use and occupation charges at market rate till the final disposal of the petition, as per the legal principl....
The determination of mesne profits or compensation depends on the location, nature, and standard rate of rent, as guided by legal principles established in Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd. vs. Federal Mo....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the tenancy terminated with the passing of the eviction order, and the tenants were liable to pay use and occupation charges to reasonably com....
The determination of user and occupation charges is based on the area, condition, and location of the demised premises, and the court has the authority to provide specific directions for payment.
Tenant cannot claim himself/herself to be tenant qua the premises in question after passing of eviction order and courts after passing of eviction order can always put the tenant of premises to terms....
The court established that in rent revision petitions, interim use and occupation charges for demised premises may be determined by balancing comparable market lease data with the parties' financial ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.