SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Varun Bhatia – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Index to the Judgment
Factual Background
Arguments Addressed Before This Court
Law on Framing of Charge And Discharge
Law of Section 509 of Indian Penal Code
i. Section 509 of IPC
ii. Essential Ingredients of Section 509 of IPC
iii. Difference Between Section 354 And Section 509 of IPC
iv. Judicial Precedents Apropos `Outraging The Modesty of A Woman
The Test of Outraging Modesty of A Women
i. Defining `Modesty'
ii. Defining `Outrage'
iii. Defining Outraging Modesty of A Women
iv. Defining Intention In Context of Section 509 IPC
Analysis And Findings
i. The Material on Record
ii. Sufficiency of Material To Attract Criminality Under Section 509 of IPC
The Role of Courts While Dealing With Gender-Specific Laws:
Striking A Neutral Chord
i. The Necessity For Court To Remain Gender Neutral While
Adjudicating Even Gender Specific Offences
Conclusion
Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.
1. The instant petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (`Cr.P.C.') has been filed on behalf of petitioner seeking setting aside of impugned order dated 05.07.2018 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate-05, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi (`Trial Court') in Criminal case no. 51656
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.