Back
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Tata Sons Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Mangal Yadav – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present suit relates to the trademark `TATA'.
3. The suit has been filed by the Plaintiff - TATA Sons Pvt. Ltd, which is the principal investor and promoter of the TATA group of companies seeking permanent injunction restraining infringement of registered trademarks and copyrights, passing off, dilution and tarnishment of trademarks, etc.
4. The mark `TATA' is one of the most reputed marks in India. The group was founded by Shri Jamsetji Nusserwanji Tata, which is a rare patronymic name possessing the distinctiveness of an invented word. The use of the mark `TATA' dates back to 1868. The group of Tata companies is generally known as the `House of Tata'. The mark `TATA' is registered in almost all goods and services considering the large expanse of the usage of the said mark. The mark `TATA' has been subject matter of litigation of several cases and injunctions have been granted protecting the mark. The TATA group of companies as on date has a consolidated revenue of $128 Billion. Undoubtedly, the mark `TATA' is a well-known mark.
5. The present suit relates to manufacture of pressure cookers under the mark `TAT
Trademark infringement and passing off of a well-known mark, and the grant of permanent injunction and damages as remedies.
Permanent injunction granted to prevent trademark infringement, passing off, and dilution, reflecting an amicable resolution and agreement by the parties.
Trademark infringement occurs when parties use marks that are identical or deceptively similar, causing confusion; summary judgment is appropriate when defendants fail to contest claims or provide a ....
Unauthorized use of a trade dress and packaging similar to that of another party's products constitutes copyright and trademark infringement, leading to the grant of permanent injunction, damages, an....
The court held that a well-known trademark, like `TATA`, is entitled to protection against any unauthorized use that may deceive the public, confirming jurisdiction over foreign entities where online....
Trademark infringement occurs when the use of a mark or trade-dress creates a likelihood of confusion among consumers; courts uphold the established goodwill of the original trademark holder.
Trademark infringement occurs when identical or confusingly similar marks serve identical services, creating potential consumer confusion.
The court affirmed that summary judgment can be granted when a defendant lacks a real prospect of successfully defending against claims of trademark infringement.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the grant of permanent injunction and award of damages in a trademark infringement case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
