Aman Gupta vs State - 2023 Supreme(Del) 3809

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Del) 3809

AMIT BANSAL
Aman Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr.Siddharth Aggarwal, Senior Advocate with Mr.Satyam Thareja, Ms.Vasundhara Nagrath and Ms.Arshiya Ghosh, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr.Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP, for State.
SI Neeraj, PS.KNK Marg.
Mr.Tanmay Mehta, Mr.Vijay Kasana, Mr.Kshitij Chhabra and Mr.Chirayu Verma, Advocates, for Complainant.

JUDGMENT

BAIL APPLN. 3408/2022

1. The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail on behalf of the applicant in FIR No.515/2022 under Sections 420/467/468/471/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered at PS KN Katju Marg.

2. The present FIR was registered on the complaint of one, Umang Garg (hereinafter `complainant'), wherein the complainant alleged that he had appointed the applicant, who was a CA, to look into books of accounts of his business. The applicant was looking after day-to-day business of the complainant and accounts related transactions for the last two years in respect of M/s Ulagarasan Impex Pvt Ltd, the company of the complainant.

3. It has been alleged in the FIR that the applicant induced the complainant to purchase goods/material through different firms, which the applicant claimed to be of his known persons. The complainant started purchasing goods/materials, through Bills/E-way Bills from the said firms and the complainant was regularly making payments to the said firms. The applicant made the complainant deposit payments of the said goods in various accounts, existing in different names and was adjusting the payments against the said fir