SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 3694

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Ajay Elangovan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Lalit, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Amit Sahni, APP, for the State Respondent No.2 through VC.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)--The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr. PC seeking quashing of FIR No. 451/2015 registered at PS Malviya Nagar under Section 341/354D/509 IPC.

2. Briefly stated, the present FIR was registered on the complaint of the victim/Respondent no. 2 wherein she alleged that she was in a relationship with the petitioner for around 8months, and during those 8 months petitioner used to drink a lot of alcohol and thereafter used to abuse her. Further, it is alleged that the petitioner used to create Drama at respondent no. 2's house at 12 AM. Thereafter, respondent no. 2 finally decided to move on in life and she stopped talking to the petitioner. The petitioner started chasing and stalking respondent No. 2 everywhere. Petitioner further used to call the friends of respondent no 2 and laterhe started threatening the victim over the phone that he would come toher rented apartment and create a tamasha in front of thehouse owner. Petitioner also threatened to block the respondent no. 2's way. The petitioner also threatened to commit suicide. Hence the present FIR was registered.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner was granted regular b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top