Central Bureau of Investigation vs A. Raja

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Del) 478

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Central Bureau of Investigation – Appellant
Versus
A. Raja – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Advocate, (Sr. Special Public Prosecutor) with Mr. Neeraj Jain, Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj & Mr. Rishi Raj Sharma (Special Public Prosecutors), Mr. Anupam Mishra, Ms. Noor Rampal, Mr. Yuvraj Sharma, Mr. Nishank Tripathi, Ms. Harshita Sukhija, Ms. Palak Jain, Ms. Shreeja Rawat, Mr.Gaurav Kumar Arya, Advocates, with Mr. Manoj Kumar, DSP-CBI., for the Petitioner; Mr. Manu Sharma, Mr. Balaji Subramanian, Mr. Karl Rustomkhan, Mr. Kartikey Masta, Mr. Gyanendra Kumar, Advocates, for R-1 & 16.; Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Senior. Advocate, with Mr. Kartikeye Dang, Mr. Sahir Seth, Mr. Arjun Varma, Mr. Aashul Agarwal, Mr. Tusharjeet Singh, Advocates, for R-2.; Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. Shivek Trehan, Ms. Rishika Goyal, Mr. Hardik Sharma Mr. Mukul Malik, Mr. Pankush Goyal, Ms. Barkha Rastogi, Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Puneet Dhawan, Advocates, for R-3 to 5, 13 to 15., Mr. Anshul Sehgal, Mr. Divyanshu Jain, Advocates, for R-6., Ms. Rebecca John Sr. Advocate, with Ms. Tarannum Cheema, Mr. Akash Singh, Mr. Akshay N., Advocates, for R-7., Mr. D. P. Singh, Mr. Vikash Kukreti, Mr. Manu Mishra, Ms. Shreya Dutt, Mr. Imaan Khera, Advocates, for R-8., Mr. Sidharth Aggarwal Sr. Advocate, , with Mohit Kr. Auluck, Mr. Vivek Nagar, Advocates, for R-9 & 11. Mr. Hariharan, Sr. Advocate, with Mohit Kr. Auluck, Mr. Vivek Nagar, Advocates, for R-10, Ms. Manali Singhal, Mr. Santosh Sachin, Mr. Deepak Singh Rawat, Advocates, for R-12., Ms. Rebecca John Sr. Advocate, , Dr. Joseph Aristotle, Sr. Advocate, with Ms. Tarannum Cheema, Ms. Priya Aristotle, Mr. Ashutosh Singh Rana, Mr. Arun Pandiyan, Mr. Akshay N., Mr. Akash S., Advocates, for R-17., for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J:

INDEX

Sr No.

Content

Brief Facts

II.

Submissions of Petitioner/Appellant

III.

Submissions of Respondents

IV.

Rejoinder Submissions

Analysis & Findings

1. The present petition has been filed seeking leave to appeal under section 378(2) read with 386 read with 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973[herein referred to as Cr.P.C.] against the order dated 21.12.2017 passed by Ld Special Judge CBI Patiala House Court in CC NO. 1/11 (CBI Vs A.Raja & Ors.).

I.I. Brief Facts

2. The briefly stated facts are that a Case bearing no. RC.DAL2009.A.0045 was registered under Section 120-B read with section 420/409/468/471/193 of IPC read with section 7 or in the alternative Section 11/12 and 13(2) read with section 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The instant case was registered on 21.10.2009 against unknown officials of the Department of Telecommunications (DoT), Government of India, unknown private persons/companies, and others for the offences punishable under various provisions alleging criminal conspiracy and criminal misconduct, in respect of allotment of Letters of Intent (LOI), Unified Access Service (UAS) Licences and spectrum by the Departm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(Del) 478

DINESH KUMAR SHARMACentral Bureau of Investigation – AppellantVersusA. Raja – Respondent

Cases Referred (71)

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Central Bureau of Investigation – Appellant
Versus
A. Raja – Respondent