SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Ruma Chakraborty – Appellant
Versus
Pranab Kumar Chakraborty – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Suresh Kumar Kait, J. - The above captioned first appeal [MAT.APP.(F.C.) 246/2023] has been preferred by the appellant against the judgment dated 13.05.2010 passed by the learned Family Court, whereby her petition under Section 13(1)(ia) and desertion under section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking divorce from respondent-husband has been dismissed.
2. The above captioned second petition [MAT.APP.(F.C) 247/2023] under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 read with Section 96 and 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has also been filed by the appellant seeking setting aside of the order dated 13.05.2010 whereby petition under Section 9 of the Act, filed by her husband i.e. respondent herein, seeking Restitution of Conjugal Rights, has been allowed by the learned Family Court.
3. The brief background of these appeals, as contemplated by the appellant, are that the parties got married on 14.12.1998 according to Hindu Rites and Ceremonies at Kanpur, U.P. and after marriage, she was taken to Rai Bareilly, U.P., which is her matrimonial home. The marriage was duly consummated and one female child was born out of the wedlock on 23.12.1999.
4. The respondent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.