SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 1152

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SUBHASH VIDYARTHI J.
Mohd. Asageer – Appellant
Versus
N.C.B – Respondent
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 27291 of 2020
Decided on : 11-10-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Shams UzZaman, Ajay Kumar Pandey, Archna Singh Jadaun
For the Respondent: Ashish Pandey

Point of Law: Section 52-A of the Act, as Disposal of seized narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances.

Headnote:

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8(c), 20(C), 28, 29, 67, 52 A (1), A(2)(c), 53, 37 - Narcotic Drugs - Seeking Release on Bail - Present application has been filed seeking release of applicant on bail in Case Crime under Sections 8(c), 20(C), 28, 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – Para 12.

Finding of the Court :

Applicant was driver of truck and apart from confessional statements of applicant and other accused persons, there is nothing to indicate that applicant knew about hidden cavity made in body of truck - Confessional statement of accused persons is not admissible in evidence in view of law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Tofan Singh - Although it is alleged that several calls had been made from mobile phone of co-accused to applicant, mobile phone allegedly used the applicant is in name of some other person - Aforesaid facts raise doubts against prosecution case and it give rise to a reasonable ground for prima facie satisfaction at this stage that applicant may not be held guilty of alleged offences - Applicant has no criminal history and, therefore, there is no ground to believe that in case applicant is released on bail, he would again indulge in committing similar offences - So far as rejection of bail application of two of other coaccused persons is concerned, it is settled law that there can be no parity in rejection of a bail application - Moreover, aforesaid points were not taken into consideration while deciding bail applications of co-accused persons - In view aforesaid discussion and without making any observations on merits of case, Court is of view that applicant is entitled to be released on bail pending conclusion of trial - Bail application is accordingly allowed.

Result: Application allowed.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Satish Trivedi Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Ajay Kumar Pandey Advocate, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ashish Pandey Advocate, the learned counsel appearing for the Narcotics Control Bureau.

2. The present application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 1 of 2020, under Sections 8(c), 20(C), 28, 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (which will hereinafter be referred to as ‘the Act’), Police Station NCB Lucknow.

3. The recovery memo states that at 19:30 hours on 01.01.2020, information was received that a Truck was transporting 500.6 kg. Ganja from Orissa to Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh and a team of officials of NCB and another team of STF started on 01.01.2020 at 21:15 hours from Lucknow and it reached Moradabad at about 04:00 a.m. on 02.01.2020. It is alleged that besides some vehicles passing on the road, no person of the public was seen nearby. It was decided that independent witness be asked from the Police Station -Special Economic Zone and the Station House Officer called two persons namely Riyasat Hussain and Zakir Hussain, who agreed to witness the recovery. The team observed a Truck parked on the road side and at about 08:45 a.m. a Car came and stopped about 100 meters away from the truck. Two suspicious persons got down the car and proceeded towards the truck while two other persons continued sitting in the car. The truck driver also got down and he along with the persons, who had got down the car, started inspecting the truck. The NCB team apprehended all the three persons and it is stated in the recovery memo that the applicant, who was driving the truck, had informed that about 600 kg. Ganja was kept in a secret cavity in the truck, which was being transported from Odisha to be delivered to Mohd. Atikurrahman resident of Gorakhpur and Zafsar Ali resident of Sambhal and the other two persons also made similar statements.

4. Thereafter the truck was taken to the campus of the police post and it was searched there, the applicant opened a secret cavity and took out 296 packets, each of which contained about 2 kg Ganja. The packets were marked and packed in 25 sacks after taking out small quantities from each of the packets. All the samples taken out were mixed together and samples of 25 gm. were drawn from each sack.

5. The applicant filed an application in the Court of Special Judge, N.D.P.S. Act / Additional Session Judge, Court No. 7, Moradabad seeking his release on bail in the aforesaid case on the ground that the applicant had been arrested from the spot and 651.300 kg. Ganja was recovered from the truck which was being driven by the applicant. and that in his statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, the applicant had confessed his complicity in the offence.

6. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case and that he has no criminal history and he has a permanent residence, so there is no chance of his absconding.

7. The Narcotics Control Bureau has filed a counter affidavit, annexing therewith a copy of the complaint filed by it in the Court of the Session Judge, Moradabad, stating that the truck was being driven by the applicant and it was owned by Jafsar Ali, who had come down from the Car alongwith another co-accused Atiqur Rehman. The two other persons who were sitting in the car were Shiv Chand Sahni and Mubarik Khan. Both the vehicles and all five suspects were taken to the police Station, where the applicant opened the cavity specially made in the truck and 296 packets containing Ganja were recovered from it. All packets were cut opened and a small portion of the substance was taken out from each packet and all the packets were placed in 25 sacks, which were serially marked as P 1 to P 25 and were weighed sack wise. Thereafter all the 25 sacks were divided into three lots and two repre

                        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                        1
                        2
                        3
                        4
                        5
                        6
                        7
                        8
                        9
                        10
                        11
                        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                        supreme today icon
                        logo-black

                        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                        Please visit our Training & Support
                        Center or Contact Us for assistance

                        qr

                        Scan Me!

                        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                        whatsapp-icon Back to top