SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5701

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Ankita Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Devi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ankur Bhasin, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
None, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 47985/2023 (for exemption)

Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the present application is disposed of.

CM(M) 1508/2023

1. This petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India impugns the order dated 07.07.2023 passed by ADJ-02, NorthDistrict, Rohini Courts, Delhi (`Trial Court') in CS DJ No. 59358/2016, dismissing the application filed by the Petitioner herein under Section 139 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (`Evidence Act') read with Section 30 and 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (`CPC').

1.1. The Petitioner is defendant no.1; Respondent no.1 is plaintiff and Respondent no.2 is defendant no.2 in the civil suit.

1.2. The Petitioner is the daughter-in-law of Respondent No.1 and the wife of the Respondent No.2.

1.3. The civil suit has been filed by the Respondent No.1 i.e., the plaintiff, seeking a decree of possession, mesne profits and permanent injunction against both the Petitioner and Respondent No.2 with respect to the property bearing house no. 61, Hari Park, Mukundpur, Delhi - 110042 (`suit property').

2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the said suit was listed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top