SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5291

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J.
Scholar Alley Pvt. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Rahul Bansal & Anr. - Respondents
CM(M) 1637 of 2023
Decided On : 17-10-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate (Through VC) and Ms. Priyanka Mandal, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Hitesh Kumar and Mr. Ankit Rana, Advocates, for the Respondents.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court's decision was influenced by the consideration of the deposit of the decretal amount before the Executing Court and the pending interim application before the concerned Commercial Court.

Headnote:

Article 227 - Impugning order of arrest warrants - The court disposed of the petition with a limited direction that the amount will not be released until a pending interim application is adjudicated upon by the concerned Commercial Court.

Fact of the Case:

The petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugned the order of arrest warrants issued against the directors of the Petitioner by the District Judge, Commercial Court-05, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the petition with a limited direction that the amount of Rs.1.43 crores will not be released by the Executing Court until 06.12.2023 to enable the Petitioner to have his interim application adjudicated upon by the concerned Commercial Court.

Issues: The issue was the release of the decretal amount by the Executing Court before the adjudication of the pending interim application by the concerned Commercial Court.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the deposit of the decretal amount before the Executing Court and directed that it will not be released until the pending interim application is adjudicated upon by the concerned Commercial Court.

Final Decision: The present petition was disposed of with a limited direction that the amount of Rs.1.43 crores will not be released by the Executing Court until 06.12.2023 to enable the Petitioner to have his interim application adjudicated upon by the concerned Commercial Court.

JUDGMENT

Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. (Oral)

CM(M) 1637/2023 and CM APPL. 51693/2023 (stay)

1. This petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India impugns the order dated 27.09.2023 passed by the District Judge, Commercial Court-05, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (`Executing Court') in Execution (COMM) No. 206/2023, titled as "Mr. Rahul Bansal v. Scholar Alley Pvt. Ltd.", whereby arrest warrants were issued against the directors of the Petitioner.

2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that in terms of the statement made before this Court on 05.10.2023, the Petitioner herein has deposited the composite amount of Rs.1.43 crores comprising of the principal and interest, before the Executing Court.

2.1. He states that in this petition, the Petitioner is seeking a limited relief to the effect that the release of the said amount by the Executing Court to the Respondent be stayed until the interim application filed by the Petitioner before the concerned Commercial Court District Judge (Commercial Court-01)/SE/Saket/ND hearing the objection petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is decided. He states that the matter is listed before the concerned Commercial Court on 06.12.2023 and an appropriate interim application seeking stay of the execution award is pending and listed for hearing on the said date.

3. In reply, the learned counsel for the Respondent confirms that the amount stands deposited before the Executing Court. He however, states that he has not been served with any copy of the interim application seeking stay of the execution award.

4. This Court has considered the submissions of the parties and in view of the deposit of decretal amount before the Executing Court, this petition is disposed of with a limited direction that the amount of Rs.1.43 crores will not be released by the Executing Court until 06.12.2023 so as to enable the Petitioner herein to have his interim application adjudicated upon by the concerned Commercial Court.

5. The learned Commercial Court is requested to hear and decide the interim application filed by the Petitioner on 06.12.2023 i.e., the next date of hearing fixed before the said Court.

6. The Petitioner undertakes that he shall remain present to address arguments before the concerned Commercial Court on 06.12.2023 and not seek any adjournment. The said statement is taken on record. It is clarified that any further orders for disbursal of the decretal amount will be passed by the concerned Commercial Court.

7. With the aforesaid direction, the present petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top