SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1032

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J.
Apollo Green Energy Limited – Appellant
Versus
Man Structurals Private Limited – Respondent
CR No.3081 of 2025 (O&M)
Decided on : 01-07-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Gaurav Chopra, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Vivek Sethi, Advocate, Mr. Rohit Jerry, Advocate, and Mr. Vardaan Seth, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Pancham Surana, Advocate, and Mr. Himanshu Setia, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Tribhuvan Dahiya, J. 

1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for setting aside order dated 02.05.2025, Annexure P-16, passed by Additional District Judge-cum-Presiding Judge, Exclusive Commercial Court at Gurugram, in CIS No.ARB-02-2024, whereby he has ordered release of the decretal amount Rs.19,33,71,085 to the respondent on furnishing Bank guarantee of the equivalent amount, during pendency of the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, 'the 1996 Act') against the award dated 10.10.2023, Annexure P-7.

2. Facts relevant to decide the matter are, disputes between the parties were referred to arbitration, which led to passing of the award dated 10.10.2023, directing the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 14,44,70,000 along with simple interest at the rate of twelve per cent per annum from the date of cause of action, along with Rs.13,09,105 as arbitration costs, to the respondents. The award was challenged before the Commercial Court at Gurugram by filing objection petition under Section 34 of the 1996 Act which is pending adjudication.

2.1. The respondent/decree holder filed an execution petition in the Delhi High Court, OMP (ENF) (Comm.) 18 of 2024 titled Man Structurals Pvt. Limited v. Apollo International Limited (now known as Apollo Green Energy Limited) for enforcement of the award. Vide order dated 23.01.2024, the Executing Court passed an interim order for maintaining status quo with regard to title of immovable properties belonging to the petitioner as mentioned in the list of assets furnished by the respondent.

2.2. Later, the Commercial Court decided the petitioner's application for stay on enforcement of the arbitral award filed under Section 36(3) of the 1996 Act, vide order dated 06.09.2024, Annexure P-10. It was partially allowed by requesting the Delhi High Court/Executing Court that the decretal amount to be deposited by the petitioner may not be disbursed to the respondent/decree holder. The order reads thus:

11. Admittedly, an execution petition has already been filed by the claimant/respondent before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court i.e. case titled as Man Structurals Pvt. Ltd. Versus Apollo International Limited (Now Apollo Green Energy Limited) OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 18/2024 in which a direction has been issued by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court vide order dated 15.07.2024 directing the judgment debtor i.e. the present petitioner to deposit the decretal amount with the learned Registrar General of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi within 8 weeks from the date of order passed by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi.

12. In the light of discussion made above and without observing anything on the merits of the case lest it may prejudice the parties while deciding the main petition under Section 34 of the Act, the application moved by the applicant/petitioner is partly allowed. On depositing of the decretal amount by the applicant/petitioner with the learned Registrar General of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, Hon'ble executing court is requested not to disburse the aforesaid amount to the respondent/claimant/DH till the decision of the main petition under Section 34 of the Act. The application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

However, request of the Commercial Court not to disburse the amount was rejected by the Executing Court, vide order dated 23.09.2024 (produced by learned counsel for the respondent and retained on the case file as Annexure 'A').

2.3. The order, dated 06.09.2024, granting conditional stay was challenged by the petitioner before this Court by filing a revision petition, CR No.5996 of 2024, which was dismissed vide judgment dated 20.11.2024, Annexure P-11. This Court was of the view that the direction to deposit the decretal amount with the Executing Court/Delhi High Court with the request not to disburse it till disposal of the objection petition under Section 34 of the 1996 Act, safeguarded the petitioner's interests.

2.4.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top