IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Amit Bansal, J.
Ajay Kumar - Appellant
Versus
State NCT of Delhi - Respondent
Bail Appln. 1627 of 2023, Bail Appln. 1643 of 2023, Bail Appln. 1644 of 2023 And Bail Appln. 1645 of 2023
Decided On : 17-11-2023
Bail - Indian Penal Code - 420/406/120B - FIR NO. 42/2019, FIR NO. 33/2019, FIR NO. 10/2019, FIR NO. 43/2019 - The court discussed the allegations of cheating, fraud, and criminal breach of trust under Sections 420/406/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) in relation to various residential projects in Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh. The court also referred to the Supreme Court's order for a forensic audit of the Amrapali Group of Companies and the diversion of funds by the accused companies. The court considered the role of the applicant in the financial affairs of the accused companies and the ongoing investigation against the Amrapali Group of Companies.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant sought regular bail in multiple FIRs related to allegations of cheating, fraud, and criminal breach of trust in residential projects. The applicant was alleged to be involved in financial fraud and diversion of funds from homebuyers.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the applicant had been involved in the construction and coordination activities of the accused companies, but specific allegations regarding financial matters were not established. The court also considered the period of incarceration, the role of the applicant, and the ongoing Supreme Court monitoring of residential projects.
Issues: The issues included the applicant's role in the financial affairs of the accused companies, the ongoing investigation, and the period of incarceration.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the lack of specific allegations against the applicant in financial matters, the period of incarceration, and the nature of evidence in the case as primary factors in granting bail.
Final Decision: The court granted bail to the applicant with specific conditions, considering the totality of the facts and circumstances.
JUDGMENT
1. By way of the present bail applications, the applicant seeks regular bail in (i) FIR NO. 42/2019 dated 16th March, 2019, (ii) FIR NO. 33/2019 dated 12th March, 2019, (iii) FIR NO. 10/2019 dated 8th February, 2019 and (iv) FIR NO. 43/2019 dated 16th March, 2019, all under Sections 420/406/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) registered at Police Station EOW.
2. The aforementioned FIRs were registered on the complaints of homebuyers, who have alleged that M/s Amrapali Leisure Valley Private Limited, M/s Amrapali Dream Valley Private Limited (hereinafter the accused companies), and their directors/officials, including the applicant herein, have committed offences of cheating, fraud and criminal breach of trust in respect of various residential projects in Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh. It is alleged that despite payment of majority of the consideration amount by most of the homebuyers, the projects were either stalled/abandoned or the possession of flats was given in a highly delayed and incomplete manner. It is further alleged that the accused persons had misrepresented the fact that all the requisite permissions/sanctions were obtained from the concerned authorities, prior to accepting the booking amount from the homebuyers.
3. The dates of arrest in each of the FIRs are as follows:
| S. No. | Name of the Project | FIR No. | BAIL APPLN. | Date of Arrest |
| 1. | Amrapali Leisure Valley | 42/2019 | 1627/2023 | 10th February, 2022 |
| 2. | Veronica Heights and Jaura Heights | 33/2019 | 1643/2023 | 23rd June, 2021 |
| 3. | Amrapali Enchante | 10/2019 | 1644/2023 | 23rd June, 2021 |
| 4. | Amrapali Adarsh Awas Yojna | 43/2019 | 1645/2023 | 10th February, 2022 |
The Chargesheet has been filed in all of the four FIRs. However, the charges are yet to be framed in any of the FIRs.
4. As per the Status Reports filed on behalf of the State, the applicant along with other accused persons, is involved in a large number of cases and the EOW and Delhi Police are investigating more than 60 cases against the Amrapali Group of Companies.
5. During the investigation, data taken from the Registrar of Companies (ROC) showed that the accused company i.e., M/s Amrapali Leisure Valley Pvt. Ltd. had last filed its audited balance sheet with the ROC for the financial year 2014-2015 and thereafter, no financial records were filed. As per the said balance sheet, out of the Rs.1009 crores received by the accused company from homebuyers for various projects developed by it, an amount to the tune of Rs.503.58 crores has been diverted in the form of long-term loans and advances and Rs.65.81 crores as short term loans and advances to the group companies of Amrapali Group and others.
6. It is submitted that the present applicant, along with other accused persons, was an authorised signatory in the bank accounts of the accused companies which proves that the applicant was at the helm of the financial affairs of the accused companies.
7. Furthermore, the entire gamut of alleged financial fraud along with siphoning of the funds, allegedly committed by the accused persons including the applicant herein has been dealt with by the Supreme Court in Bikram Chatterji and Ors. v. Union of India in Writ Petition No. 940/2017 dated 23rd July, 2019. Further, the Supreme Court had also ordered a forensic audit of the Amrapali Group of Companies. As per the findings of the Forensic Auditor, the accused companies i.e., M/s Amrapali Leisure Valley Private Limited and M/s Amrapali Dream Valley Private Limited have diverted huge amounts to the tune of Rs.431.11 crores and Rs.445.33 crores respectively, collected from homebuyers, in the form of Inter Corporate Deposits (ICDs) to other companies in the Amrapali Group.
8. Per Contra, it has been submitted on behalf of the counsel for the applicant that the applicant herein has neither been named, nor there is any allegation against him in any of the aforementioned four FIRs.
9. It is submitted that the applicant is one of the directors of the holding company of the Amrapali Group of Companies i.e. M/s Ultra H
Bail is the rule and jail is an exception, and the right to speedy trial and justice is a fundamental right.
The right to speedy trial and access to justice as fundamental rights, and the consideration of the nature of accusations and the accused's role in the alleged offenses in determining bail eligibilit....
Serious allegations of fraud and misappropriation justify denial of bail; medical concerns do not outweigh risk factors associated with the case.
The right to speedy trial, the principle that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, and the consideration of the approval of the Resolution Plan in the context of the accused's lack of control ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that bail is the rule and jail is an exception, emphasizing the right to speedy trial and the principle that deprivation of liberty must be conside....
Bail cannot be granted in cases involving serious allegations such as fraud and misrepresentation, especially when the accused poses a potential flight risk.
The denial of bail was influenced by the potential impact of the offense on the economy and the affected buyers, as well as the petitioner's alleged involvement in the unauthorized sale/allotment of ....
Point of Law : Legal position set out in the decision referred to hereinabove, the instances of forgery committed by the applicant, not only in the transactions entered with the complainant but also ....
The court denied anticipatory bail despite the applicant's health condition due to serious allegations of multi-victim fraud, emphasizing the need for custodial interrogation to uncover financial mis....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.