SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Anil Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. allegations of fraud in housing project. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments for bail based on medical needs. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. state's arguments against bail. (Para 6 , 7)
4. considerations for bail decisions. (Para 8 , 9)
5. evidence of wrongdoing by the petitioner. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 15 , 16)
6. petitioner's health concerns addressed. (Para 17 , 18)
7. court denies bail due to allegations. (Para 19)
8. final decision on bail application. (Para 20 , 21)

JUDGMENT

Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.

1. The petitioner through instant application filed under Section 439 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter "Cr.P.C."), 1973seeks regular bail on medical ground as well as on merits in case/FIR no. 270/2019, registered at Police Station Economic Offences Wing (EOW), District-East, Delhi for the offences punishable under Sections 409/420/406/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. The brief facts of the case are that FIR bearing no. 270/2019 was registered against the petitioner and other co-accused for the offences punishable under Sections 409/420/406/120B of IPC. It is alleged that Flat No. S-904 was allotted to the Complainant vide letter no. 029/S/904/58

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top