Back
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Jawaharlal Nehru National Youth Centre – Appellant
Versus
Praveen Singh Aron – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. (Oral)
CM APPL. 57185/2023 (for exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of.
CM(M) 1803/2023, CM APPL. 57184/2023
1. The present petition impugns the order dated 22.07.2023 under Article 227 of the Constitution of India passed by the Additional District Judge - 01, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in CS 57975/2016, titled as Jawahar Lal Nehru National Youth Central & Ors v. Sh Narain Dutt Tiwari & Ors (`Trial Court') whereby the Trial Court adjourned the suit proceedings with directions to the parties to first avail the appropriate legal recourse to ascertain who will represent plaintiff no.1 to proceed further in the matter.
1.1. The plaintiff no.1 before the Trial Court is Jawahar Lal Nehru National Youth Centre which is Petitioner no. 1 herein. The aforesaid civil suit was filed by plaintiff no.1 through its then Vice president and General Secretary Smt. Indira Mayaram seeking Declaration and Permanent Injunction against the Respondents therein.
1.2. Smt. Indira Mayaram has since passed away. The Petitioner no. 1 has taken a stance before the Trial Court that the plaintiff no.1 is bei
Competence of the Trial Court to determine the issue of representation in civil suit proceedings under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
Legal representation in appeals must be determined through proper inquiry and evidence, not conjecture, as mandated by procedural law.
The Appellate Court has discretion in determining legal representation without remanding to the Trial Court, and the validity of a Will can be established through documentary evidence.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the proposed issues by the defendant no.1 were already covered by existing issues and did not need to be separately framed. The Court also emp....
The main legal point established is that parties with the same interest in the subject matter are necessary parties and can be joined in the same litigation.
Rejection by the High Court of the applications to set aside abatement, condonation and brining on record the legal representatives does not appear, on the peculiar nature of the case, to be a just o....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
