SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1753

SANJAY VASHISTH
Gurmeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Harjinder Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Vaibhav Sehgal, Mr. Abdul Shehbaz Thind

Judgment

Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, J.

Present revision petition is directed against the order dated 15.11.2017, passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Ludhiana, whereby, suit qua defendant No.1 – Sarwan Singh (now deceased), has been dismissed on account of non-impleadment of legal representative(s) of defendant No.1.

2. Petitioners (hereinafter referred to as ‘plaintiffs’) instituted a suit for possession as owner by way of specific performance of the agreement to sell dated 06.08.1990, in respect of a plot measuring 600 sq. yards, comprised in Khasra No.890/2 as per Jamabandi for the year 2009-10, situated at Mundian Kalan and now known as Jeewan Nagar, Street No.21, Phase-III, Focal Point, Tehsil and District Ludhiana.

3. Said suit was instituted against (i) Sarwan Singh; (ii) Harjinder Singh, both sons of Gurnam Singh, resident of Mundian Kalan, Tehsil and District Ludhiana; and (iii) Kamal Parkash s/o Sardar Singh. Thus, defendants No.1 & 2 are the real brothers and residents of the same village.

4. During the pendency of suit, defendant No.1 – Sarwan Singh died on 15.01.2016, but no application by anyone had been moved for bringing on record the legal representatives (in shor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top