Back
SANJAY VASHISTH
Gurmeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Harjinder Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background facts of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. issues relating to the non-impleadment of legal representatives (Para 4 , 5 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. analysis of order xxii rule 4 and amendments (Para 15 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. court's interpretation and ruling on the case (Para 19 , 27 , 29) |
| 5. conclusion and final order of the court (Para 30) |
Judgment
Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, J.
Present revision petition is directed against the order dated 15.11.2017, passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Ludhiana, whereby, suit qua defendant No.1 – Sarwan Singh (now deceased), has been dismissed on account of non-impleadment of legal representative(s) of defendant No.1.
2. Petitioners (hereinafter referred to as ‘plaintiffs’) instituted a suit for possession as owner by way of specific performance of the agreement to sell dated 06.08.1990, in respect of a plot measuring 600 sq. yards, comprised in Khasra No.890/2 as per Jamabandi for the year 2009-10, situated at Mundian Kalan and now known as Jeewan Nagar, Street No.21, Phase-III, Focal Point, Tehsil and District Ludhiana.
3. Said suit was instituted against (i) Sarwan Singh; (ii) Harjinder Singh, both sons of Gurnam Singh, resident of Mundian Kalan
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
