SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5554

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dharmesh Sharma, J.
Paramvir Singh - Appellant
Versus
Presidium Breweries Pvt. Ltd. - Respondent
CO.PET. 306 of 2012
Decided On : 23-11-2023

Advocates appeared:
Appearance not given, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Isha Khanna, Standing Counsel, for the OL.

IMPORTANT POINT
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing for the dissolution of a company when the affairs have been completely wound up or when the liquidator cannot proceed due to lack of funds or other reasons.

Headnote:

COMPANIES ACT - Dissolution of Company - Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 - Companies Act, 1956 [Section 481], Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 [Rule 9], Punjab Excise Bonded Warehouse Rules, 1957 [Rule 53] - The judgment discusses the application filed by the Official Liquidator under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking dissolution of the respondent company in liquidation. It also refers to the relevant rules and orders related to winding up, disposal of company stock, and settlement of claims. The court's decision is influenced by the interpretation of Section 481 and the legal principles established in the case of Meghal Homes (P) Ltd. v. Shree Niwas Girni K.K. Samiti & Ors., (2007) 7 SCC 753, which allows for dissolution of a company when the affairs have been completely wound up or when the liquidator cannot proceed due to lack of funds or other reasons.

Fact of the Case:

The Official Liquidator filed an application seeking dissolution of the respondent company in liquidation under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956. The company was earlier ordered to be wound up provisionally, and various orders related to the disposal of company stock and settlement of claims were issued.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the company's affairs had been completely wound up, and there were no funds or assets from which any money could be recovered. It concluded that the liquidation proceedings warranted to be brought to an end, and granted the Official Liquidator's application for dissolution of the company.

Issues: The main issue was whether the company should be dissolved under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, considering the lack of funds and assets for winding up proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the interpretation of Section 481 and the legal principles established in the case of Meghal Homes (P) Ltd. v. Shree Niwas Girni K.K. Samiti & Ors., (2007) 7 SCC 753, which allows for dissolution of a company when the affairs have been completely wound up or when the liquidator cannot proceed due to lack of funds or other reasons.

Final Decision: The respondent company M/s. Presidium Breweries Limited was dissolved, and the Official Liquidator was discharged. The Official Liquidator was permitted to close the books of accounts of the company, and a copy of the judgment was to be communicated to the Registrar of Companies within 30 days.

JUDGMENT

CO. APPL. 836/2023 (UNDER SECTION 481 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956)

1. This is an application filed by the Official Liquidator under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 [The Act] read with Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 [Rules], praying that the respondent company (in liquidation) be dissolved and the Official Liquidator be discharged as its Liquidator.

2. Vide order dated 15.05.2013 the company was ordered to be wound up provisionally and Official Liquidator attached to this court was appointed as the Provisional Liquidator of the company.

3. It was also brought to the notice of the Court that the Ex-Director of the company (in liquidation) Mr. Ravi Kumar had earlier moved CM No. 16065/2013 in Co. Appeal No. 73/2013, seeking a stay of the winding up order dated 15.05.2013 passed by the Hon'ble Company Judge, which was granted by a Division Bench of this Court, vide order dated 09.10.2013. By a subsequent order of the Division Bench dated 22.04.2014 the company (in liquidation) was directed to deposit a sum of Rs.9,00,000/- within a period of 30 days. However, as the respondent company failed to comply with this order, the company petition for winding up was admitted once again in compliance with the directions of the Division Bench order dated 22.04.2014, and the same has been noted in order dated 27.05.2014 of this petition.

4. It is stated that as per the record of the Registrar of Companies, Delhi and Haryana, the following persons were found to be the Ex-Directors of the company (in liquidation):

    (i) Mr. Ravi Kumar,

    (ii) Mr. Jitendra Kukreja,

5. The registered office of the company (in liquidation) was situated at J-84, Kalkaji Extension, New Delhi. It has been submitted that the possession of the said premises could not be taken as on visit by the officials of the Official Liquidator's office, it was found that the same was a residential premise.

6. It is stated in the application that a team of officials visited village Behra, Dera Bassi, SAS Nagar, where the seized stock of the company was stored. The officials met with the DGM Mr. Lokendraveer Sharma of Alcobrew Distillers, India Private Limited, who identified the stock of the respondent company as per the register of stocks maintained there. Subsequent to verification of the record, the stock of the company (in liquidation) was given on superdari to the DGM till further orders.

7. It has also been stated in the application that, as per the report of the Food Analyst dated 29.06.2015, it was informed by the Commissioner Excise and Taxation (Punjab) that the samples of liquor contained suspended matter and were unsafe for consumption, and therefore, the stock of the company could not be sold for making recoveries. Furthermore, although efforts were made to determine whether the seized liquor could be used for industrial or other purposes, in accordance with Rule 53 of the Punjab Excise Bonded Warehouse Rules, 1957, however, its suitability for the same could not be ascertained. Since it was concluded that the entire stock of the liquor has to be discarded certain directions were passed vide order dated 31.05.2023. In compliance of the same, the stock was discarded and the empty bottles were sold for a sum of Rs.11,952/-. Further, as per directions of the order Rs.39,600/- was also released in favour of Mr. N.R. Sharma (Chemical Engineer) from the Common Pool Funds ["CPL"].

8. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Official Liquidator that thereafter, vide order dated 29.04.2022 in CO. APPL. 275/2022 the Official Liquidator was permitted to invite claims from the creditors of the company. In compliance of the same, claims were invited from the workmen and secured creditors of the company (in liquidation) on 18.06.2022. Citations were published in the newspapers, namely `Veer Arjun' and `Indian Express' and last date for submission of claims with the Official Liquidator was 08.07.2022. Only one claim was received from the petitioner herein, Mr. Param

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top