IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dharmesh Sharma, J.
M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Manisha Parivahan (P.) Ltd. - Respondent
CO.PET. 430 of 2009 and Cr.O.(CO.) 3 of 2014 and CO.APPL.644 of 2023
Decided On : 05-01-2024
COMPANIES ACT - DISSOLUTION - 481 - The court discussed the provisions of Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 and the case of Meghal Homes (P.) Ltd. v. Shree Niwas Girni K.K. Samiti & Ors., (2007) 7 SCC 753, and decided to dissolve the respondent company and discharge the Official Liquidator.
Fact of the Case:
The Official Liquidator filed an application seeking dissolution of the respondent company (in liquidation) under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the company was unable to pay its debts and the Official Liquidator had no knowledge of any recoverable assets, leading to the decision to dissolve the company.
Issues: Winding up of the respondent company, failure of the Ex-directors to comply with court orders, and the Official Liquidator seeking dissolution of the company.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 and the case of Meghal Homes (P.) Ltd. v. Shree Niwas Girni K.K. Samiti & Ors., (2007) 7 SCC 753 to decide on the dissolution of the company.
Final Decision: The respondent company was dissolved, and the Official Liquidator was discharged. The pending application was also disposed of.
JUDGMENT
CO. APPL. 641/2023 (UNDER SECTION 481 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956)
1. This is an application filed by the Official Liquidator under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956[The Act] read with Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959[Rules], praying that the respondent company (in liquidation) be dissolved and the Official Liquidator be discharged as its Liquidator.
2. This application for dissolution of the company (in liquidation) has been moved in the present Company Petition preferred under Section 433(1)(e) read with Sections 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 by the petitioners, who sought winding up of the respondent company on the ground that the respondent company was unable to pay its debts amounting to Rs. 28,61,469/- despite serving of statutory notice dated 22.06.2009.
3. This Court in exercise of its jurisdiction vide order dated 05.08.2011, directed the respondent company to be wound up provisionally and an Official Liquidator attached to this court was appointed as the Provisional Liquidator of the company. Furthermore, the respondent company, its Directors, officers, employees, authorised representatives were restrained from selling, alienating, encumbering and parting with the possession of any movable and immovable assets and funds of the company.
4. It is apposite to note that on the basis of an undertaking by the respondent company to pay the petitioner bank a sum of Rs. 33 lacs towards full and final settlement of its dues, the earlier order dated 05.08.2011 was vacated by this court vide order dated 23.12.2011, and the Official Liquidator was discharged. However, the respondent company failed to make payments as per the settlement/undertaken given by it, whereafter an application bearing No. CO.APPL. 1504/2012 was moved seeking revival of the winding-up proceedings. The same was allowed vide order dated 08.08.2013 and a Provisional Liquidator was appointed to initiate appropriate winding up proceedings against the company. Further, the Ex-directors were directed to hand over the assets, records and books of accounts of the company to the Official Liquidator, as also file a statement of affairs by issue of notices under Sections 456 and 454 of the Companies Act, 1956.
5. It is brought out that as per the record of the Registrar of Companies, Delhi and Haryana, the Registered Office of the company is situated at S-98, Sunder Block, Sharapur, Delhi-92, and the following persons have been shown to be the Ex-Directors of the company (in liquidation):
i. Mr. Dilip Kochar,
S/o Late Vijay Singh Kochar, residing at E-202, Sukhan Residency, L.P. Sarvani Road, Adajan, Surat, Gujarat; and
ii. Mr. Babu Lal Kochar,
Residing at #743, Deshpandele House, Tri Murti Nagar, Nagpur, Maharashtra.
6. The record of the Registrar of Companies also shows that besides the registered office of the company (in liquidation) which is located at S-98, Sunder Block, Shakarpur, Delhi, the following properties are also shown as belonging to the respondent company:
i. D-503, 5th Floor, Sahnip Vicco, Surat, Gujarat;
ii. New City 299, Ashirvad Villa, Surat, Gujarat;
iii. 804/A, Centre Point, Ring Road, Suraj, Gujarat; and
iv. 1/9, Kusum Chandra Park, Char Rasta Hazira Road, Icchapur, Surat, Gujarat;
7. It has been submitted that the possession of the abovementioned premises could not be taken as on visit by the officials of the Official Liquidator's office, it was found that the same were residential flats. With respect to the premises at serial No. (iv), it has been stated that the premises was locked, and a board of M/s Radhe Roadways was affixed at the shop, which was given on rent to the company (in liquidation) which apparently vacated in favour of the landlord.
8. With regards to other movable assets and funds of the company (in liquidation), it has been submitted that vide letter dated 08.11.2014, ICICI Bank, Surat Branch had informed that there are no funds available for remittance in the account of the company (in liquidation). A perusa
Meghal Homes (P.) Ltd. v. Shree Niwas Girni K.K. Samiti & Ors.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the dissolution of a company in liquidation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing for the dissolution of a company when the affairs have been ....
The court can order the dissolution of a company under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 when the Official Liquidator cannot proceed with the winding up of the company due to lack of funds or as....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, a company can be dissolved when the affairs of the company have been completely wound up or when....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, for the dissolution of a company in liquidation.
Final dissolution of a company is warranted under Section 481 when no assets remain and no claims have been received from creditors, affirming the necessity for liquidation procedures.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that when a company has no assets and no claims are received from creditors, it may be dissolved under the Companies Act.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the dissolution of a company when it is just and reasonable in the circumstances o....
The lack of assets for realization in the interest of the creditors can be a ground for ordering the dissolution of a company under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.