SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5467

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Madhuri Goel – Appellant
Versus
Chandra Prakash – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Aakash Sehrawat and Mr. Jatin Chillar, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
None, for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 63572/2023 (for exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of.

CM(M) 2024/2023 & CM APPL. 63571/2023

1. This petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India impugns the order dated 01.08.2023 passed by the Civil Judge (South-East), Saket Courts, New Delhi (`Trial Court') in the civil suit bearing CS No. 2741/2022 titled as 'Madhuri Goel Vs Chandra Prakash & Anr.' whereby, the Trial Court directed the Petitioner herein to amend her plaint to include the relief of declaration, possession and consequential relief of injunction.

1.1. The Petitioner herein is the plaintiff and the Respondents are the defendants in the said civil suit. The said civil suit has been filed seeking permanent injunction against the Respondents with respect to the property bearing no. E-135/5, Pul Prahladpur, New Delhi-110044 (`suit property')

2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that in the facts of this case, as per the averments made in the plaint, the Petitioner was in a constructive possession of the suit property through his tenants, as on the date of the institution of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top