SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5520

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Krishan Kumar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Nalin Tripathi, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Abhishek Kumar and Mr. Sumit Kashyap, Advocates for R-1.

JUDGMENT

Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 64738/2023 (for exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of.

CM(M) 2062/2023, CM APPL. 64737/2023

1. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, impugns the order dated 24.01.2023 passed by the Additonal District Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (`Trial Court') in a civil suit bearing CS DJ No. 618788/16 titled as `Krishan Kumar v. Ashok Kumar & Ors.', whereby the Trial Court had disposed of an application filed by the Respondent No. 2 herein, under Order 39, Rule 2A, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (`CPC') and issued directions to the Station House Officer (SHO) for ensuring compliance of the directions contained therein.

2. The Petitioner has also impugned the order dated 25.08.2023 passed in the said civil suit, whereby the application filed by the Petitioner seeking review of the impugned order dated 24.01.2023 has been dismissed by the Trial Court.

3. Learned counsel for the Respondent No.1 has entered appearance on advance notice and states that the Petitioner has not disclosed the Trial Court's order dated 17.03.2023, where similar objections r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top