SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5497

ANISH DAYAL
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Reena – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate, for the Appellant.
Mr. R.S. Lathwal, Advocate for R-1 to 3.

JUDGMENT

Anish Dayal, J.

1. This appeal has been filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 ("the Act") assailing award dated 17.01.2015 by the Presiding Officer, MACT, Central District, Delhi in Suit No. 188/2010 titled as "Smt. Reena & Ors. v. Shri Sandeep & Ors." The Tribunal held that the claimants were entitled to Rs. 26,11,000/- with interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of filing the claim. The wife of the deceased, Reena was held entitled to 50%, and the parents were held entitled to 25% each of the awarded amount.

Factual Background

2. Respondent No. 1 is widow of Late Rajiv Singh while respondent no. 2 and 3 are mother and father of deceased Rajiv Singh, respectively. The deceased succumbed to injuries sustained by him in a road accident.

3. On 02.12.2009, at about 9:30 P.M. the deceased, Rajiv Singh, was travelling along with one Sandeep, the driver of the vehicle, which was loaded with vegetables, bearing registration No. DL 1 LG 8898 (Tata 407). Their vehicle met with an accident near Maan Dhaba, Murthal, District Sonepat, Haryana and Rajiv Singh was rushed to the local government hospital. From there he was moved to Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Hospital Delhi, where he su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top