2023 Supreme(Del) 6032
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Anil Kumar Anand – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Advocates appeared:
Petitioner in-person.
Mr.Rajiv Kapur and Mr.Akshit Kapur, Advocates for R-4/SB.
Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC with Ms.Shreya Jetly, Advocates for R-1/UOI W.P.(C) 6042/2018 & CM APPL. 23439/2018, W.P.(C) 5283/2016, CM APPL. 43992/2017 & CM APPL. 45909/2018, W.P.(C) 950/2020, W.P.(C) 2564/2020.
Mr.Sanjay K.Yadav, Advocate for Bank of Baroda in W.P.(C) 6042/2018 & CM APPL. 23439/2018, W.P.(C) 5283/2016, CM APPL. 43992/2017 & CM APPL. 45909/2018, W.P.(C) 950/2020, W.P.(C) 2564/2020.
Mr.Pallav Shishodia, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate for UTI in W.P.(C) 6042/2018 & CM APPL. 23439/2018, W.P.(C) 5283/2016, CM APPL. 43992/2017 & CM APPL. 45909/2018.
Mr.Rakesh Kumar, CGSC with Mr.Sunil, Advocate for R-1/UOI in W.P.(C) 7114/2015, CM APPL. 5893/2018 & CM APPL. 41211/2019.
Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Mr.H.K.Naik and Mr.Ajay Amrit Raj, Advocates for R- 2, 3 and 5 in W.P.(C) 7114/2015, CM APPL. 5893/2018 & CM APPL. 41211/2019.
Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Mr.H.K.Naik and Mr.Ajay Amrit Raj, Advocates for UTI in W.P.(C) 950/2020, W.P.(C) 2564/2020, W.P.(C) 965/2020, CM APPL. 3075/2020, CM APPL. 43896/2021 & CM APPL. 7903/2022.
Mr.Rajesh K.Gautam, Mr.Anant Gautam, Mr.Sumit Sharma, Ms.Anani Achumi, Mr.Dinesh Sharma and Ms.Shivani Sagar, Advocates for PNB in W.P.(C) 5283/2016, CM APPL. 43992/2017 & CM APPL. 45909/2018, W.P.(C) 965/2020, CM APPL. 3075/2020, CM APPL. 43896/2021 & CM APPL. 7903/2022.
Mr.Vijay Joshi, CGSC for R-1/UOI in W.P.(C) 965/2020, CM APPL. 3075/2020, CM APPL. 43896/2021 & CM APPL. 7903/2022
Mr.Rajnish K.Jha, Advocate for Bank of Baroda in W.P.(C) 965/2020, CM APPL. 3075/2020, CM APPL. 43896/2021 & CM APPL. 7903/2022.
JUDGMENT
Chandra Dhari Singh, J.
1. The instant batch of writ petitions, details of which have been tabulated below have been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking the reliefs as follows:
| S. NO. | CASE NO. | RELIEF SOUGHT | 1 | W.P. (C) 7114/ 2015 | a. issue a writ of mandamus or cerciorary or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash the report of the review DPC dated January 09, 2008.
b. issue a writ of mandamus or cerciorary or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondent to promote the petitioner to Grade 'C in Scale-III, with retrospective effect from January 2, 1995 for the panel year 1994-95 and to consider the petitioner for further promotions to higher Grades, with retrospective effect, as per the Promotion Policy and instructions issued by the Government of India and to give all the consequential benefits with due seniority.
c. issue a writ of mandamus or certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondent to treat the petitioner as deemed to have been promoted to Grade 'C. in Scale-III, with retrospective effect from January 2, 1995 and to consider the petitioner for further promotions to higher Grades with retrospect
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
Back
