Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J.
Uday Singtha - Appellant
Versus
The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. - Respondents
Crl.M.C. 368 of 2024
Decided On : 16-01-2024
Section 482 - Quashing of FIR - Amicable Settlement
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to quash FIR registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC read with Section 4 of DP Act due to amicable settlement between the parties.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the matter had been amicably settled between the parties without any threat, pressure, or coercion, and concluded that keeping the case pending would be an abuse of the process of the court.
Issues: The issue was whether the FIR should be quashed in light of the amicable settlement between the parties.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the amicable settlement between the parties and the absence of any further adjudication needed, leading to the decision to quash the FIR.
Final Decision: FIR No. 16/2013 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC read with Section 4 of DP Act registered at P.S.: Mansarover Park, Delhi and proceedings emanating therefrom were quashed.
JUDGMENT
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J. (Oral)
1. Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (`Cr.P.C.') has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner for quashing of FIR No. 16/2013 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC read with Section 4 of DP Act registered at P.S.: Mansarover Park, Delhi and proceedings emanating therefrom.
2. Issue notice. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for respondent No. 2 alongwith respondent No. 2 in person appear on advance notice and accept notice.
3. In brief, as per the case of the petitioner, marriage between petitioner and respondent No. 2 was solemnized according to Hindu rites and ceremonies on 02.03.2009. A female child was born out of the wedlock on 17.05.2011. Due to temperamental differences, respondent No. 2 and petitioner could not live together and have been living separately. On complaint of respondent No. 2, present FIR was registered.
4. The matter is stated to have been amicably resolved between the parties in terms of settlement deed dated 07.06.2016. The marriage between petitioner and respondent No. 2 is stated to have been dissolved by decree of divorce by way of mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act.
5. Learned APP for the State submits that in view of amicable settlement between the parties, the State has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.
6. Petitioner as well as respondent No. 2 are present in-person in the Court today and have been identified by SI Yogesh, PS: Mansarover Park, Delhi. I have interacted with the parties and they confirm that the matter has been amicably settled between them without any threat, pressure or coercion. Respondent No. 2 also states that nothing remains to be further adjudicated upon between the parties and she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the case pending. It would be nothing but an abuse of the process of Court. Consequently, FIR No. 16/2013 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC read with Section 4 of DP Act registered at P.S.: Mansarover Park, Delhi and proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed.
Petition is accordingly disposed of. A copy of this order be forwarded to the concerned Trial Court for information.
The court can quash an FIR if the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the case pending.
The court has the discretion to quash FIR based on amicable settlement between the parties to prevent abuse of the court process.
The court has the discretion to quash an FIR if the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and keeping the case pending would serve no useful purpose.
The court has the power to quash FIRs under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure when the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and keeping the case pending would serve no use....
The court has the discretion to quash FIRs in cases where the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, and keeping the case pending would serve no useful purpose.
The court can quash an FIR and proceedings if the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, and keeping the case pending would serve no useful purpose.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that an amicable settlement between the parties, coupled with the absence of objection from the State, can be grounds for quashing an FIR.
The court has the discretion to quash FIR and proceedings if the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the case pending.
The court has the discretion to quash FIR and proceedings if the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, and keeping the case pending would serve no useful purpose and would be an abuse....
The court has the discretion to quash an FIR and related proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties, where it deems that no useful purpose would be served by continuing with the ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
