Back
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
Naveen And Others – Appellant
Versus
State NCT of Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J. (Oral)
CRL.M.A. 1656/2024
Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 421/2024
1. Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (`Cr.P.C.') has been preferred on behalf of the petitioners for quashing of FIR No. 1182/2018 under Sections 489A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S.: Mangolpuri, Delhi and proceedings emanating therefrom.
2. Issue notice. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for respondent No. 2 alongwith respondent No. 2 in person appear on advance notice and accept notice.
3. In brief, as per the case of the petitioner, marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 was solemnized according to Hindu rites and ceremonies on 10.12.2012. No child is stated to be born out of the wedlock. Due to temperamental differences, respondent No. 2 and petitioner No. 1 could not live together and have been living separately since August, 2017. On complaint of respondent No. 2, present FIR was registered.
4. The matter is stated to have been amicably resolved between the parties in terms of settlement deed dated 26.08.2022. The marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 is
The court has the discretion to quash FIRs in cases where the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, and keeping the case pending would serve no useful purpose.
The court has the power to quash FIRs under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure when the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and keeping the case pending would serve no use....
The court has the discretion to quash an FIR if the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and keeping the case pending would serve no useful purpose.
The court has the discretion to quash FIR based on amicable settlement between the parties to prevent abuse of the court process.
The court can quash an FIR if the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the case pending.
The court can quash an FIR and proceedings if the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, and keeping the case pending would serve no useful purpose.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's power to quash criminal proceedings or FIR in cases of amicable settlement, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, bas....
The court has the discretion to quash FIR and proceedings if the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, and keeping the case pending would serve no useful purpose and would be an abuse....
The court has the discretion to quash an FIR and related proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties, where it deems that no useful purpose would be served by continuing with the ....
The main legal point established is that in cases of amicable settlement between the parties, the court may quash FIR and proceedings emanating therefrom to prevent abuse of the court's process.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
