SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 156

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Tushar Rao Gedela, J.
Shreya Suman - Appellant
Versus
Punjab And Sind Bank And Others - Respondent
W.P.(C) 592 of 2024
Decided On : 24-01-2024

Advocates appeared:
Mr. S.K. Gupta and Mr. Udit Gupta, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam, Mr. Anant Gautam, Mr. Dinesh Sharma, Ms. Anani Achumi and Ms. Shivani Sagar, Advocates, for the Respondent.

IMPORTANT POINT
Timely disposal of statutory appeals and adherence to principles of natural justice and the law

Headnote:

Exemption - Statutory Appeal - The court directed the respondent-appellate authority to dispose of the statutory appeal filed by the petitioner within six weeks, emphasizing the need for the appeal to be decided within a stipulated period of time and in accordance with principles of natural justice and the law.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a direction to the respondent-appellate authority to decide the statutory appeal challenging the order of dismissal within a stipulated period of time.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the respondent to dispose of the statutory appeal within six weeks, ensuring the petitioner's rights to natural justice and in accordance with the law.

Issues: Delay in disposal of statutory appeal

Ratio Decidendi: The need for timely disposal of statutory appeals and adherence to principles of natural justice and the law

Final Decision: The court directed the respondent to dispose of the statutory appeal within six weeks, granting the petitioner all opportunities in terms of principles of natural justice and in accordance with the law.

JUDGMENT

Tushar Rao Gedela, J. (Oral)

[The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid mode]

CM APPL. 2678/2024

1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 592/2024

3. By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent-appellate authority to decide the statutory appeal of the petitioner dated 06.06.2023, whereby the petitioner challenged the order of dismissal dated 28.04.2023.

4. Mr. S.K. Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the statutory appeal could not have been kept pending for such a long time, constraining the petitioner to approach this Court for an innocuous relief of disposal of the statutory appeal within a stipulated period of time.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the said statutory appeal would be disposed of within a period of eight weeks.

6. Keeping in view the fact that the statutory appeal has not yet been disposed of despite having been filed on 06.06.2023, this Court is of the considered opinion that it would suffice in case the respondent is directed to dispose of the said statutory appeal dated 06.06.2023, filed by the petitioner within six weeks from today.

7. It goes without saying that the petitioner shall be granted all the opportunities in terms of principles of natural justice and in accordance with law and rules on the subject and the order would obviously be reasoned.

8. The aforesaid petition alongwith pending application stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top