SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5566

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, MANOJ JAIN
P Pavan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Central Industrial Security Force – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Romil Pathak, Mr. Amit Kumar and Mr. Aryan Pathak, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Gagan Kumar, SPC with Ms. Seema Singh, GP and Mr. Nishtha, Advocate, for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral) - Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has filed a Revision Petition as well as a Statutory Appeal which have not been disposed of and petitioner would be satisfied at this juncture in case the appeal of the petitioner is disposed of expeditiously.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that Statutory Appeal of the petitioner is pending consideration and shall be disposed of in accordance with law.

3. The petition is accordingly disposed of directing the respondents to dispose of the Statutory Appeal of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law.

4. Needless to state, in case petitioner is aggrieved by any further order passed by the respondents he would be entitled to avail of such remedies as may be available in law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top