IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Manoj Jain, JJ.
Ambrish Radheshyam Tiwari - Appellant
Versus
State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(Crl.) 81 of 2024
Decided On : 09-02-2024
Habeas Corpus - Wife's Decision - The court found that the wife, being an adult and married, had the right to make her own decision regarding her living arrangements, and therefore, no further order was required in the present petition.
Fact of the Case:
The wife of the petitioner expressed her desire to continue living with her parents and refused to go back to her husband, despite his interest in keeping her with him.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that since the wife had made her decision as an adult, no further order was necessary, and directed the respondent/State to make arrangements for her to reach her native place safely.
Issues: The main issue was the wife's decision regarding her living arrangements and the petitioner's request for her custody.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the wife's status as an adult and married individual, allowing her to make her own decision regarding her living arrangements.
Final Decision: The petition was disposed of, with the direction for the respondent/State to make arrangements for the wife to reach her native place safely.
JUDGMENT (Oral)
MANOJ JAIN, J.
1. The present writ of Habeas Corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C has been preferred by the petitioner seeking the following prayer:
"A) This Hon'ble court may be pleased to kindly issue an appropriate Writ of habeas corpus and/or direct the present Respondents No. 2 to 6 produce the corpus i.e. Amisha @ Alish Begum - Wife of the petitioner before this Honourable Court."
B) This Hon'ble court may be further pleased to kindly record the statement of Amisha @ Alish Begum - Wife of the petitioner and thereafter be pleased to kindly release her from the illegal detention / confinement of Respondent No. 4 to 6 and handover the custody of Amisha @ Alish Begum to the petitioner forthwith."
2. On 01.02.2024, learned Standing Counsel had informed this Court that the wife of the petitioner had been contacted and she had requested to appear before this Court through video conferencing. Accordingly, she appeared through Whatsapp Video Call and stated that she did not want to go back to her husband and would like to continue to live with her parents. Petitioner, who was also present in Court that date, submitted that his wife had been tortured and was under the pressure of her parents while appearing through Whatsapp Video Call and requested for her physical appearance. Accordingly, we directed the respondent/State to produce the wife of the petitioner physically before this Court on the next date.
3. The parties are present in Court in person.
4. We have interacted with the parties in the Court as well as in the chamber. Though, the petitioner is very much interested in keeping his wife with him, however, his wife flatly refused to go with the petitioner/her husband. She reiterated that she would like to continue to live with her parents.
5. Since the wife of the petitioner is adult and is married and has taken a decision on her own, no further order is required in the present petition.
6. The wife of the petitioner also states that she has some apprehension and wants her to be escorted back to her native place.
7. Therefore, respondent/State is directed to make arrangements to escort her to the railway station or bus stop so as to enable her to reach her native place safely. It is further directed that the petitioner shall not create any ruckus and shall not indulge in any act resulting in any untoward incident.
8. Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
9. Parties would, however, be at liberty to take appropriate steps before the appropriate Forum as permissible under law.
An adult and married individual has the right to make their own decision regarding their living arrangements.
A Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed when an alleged detenue voluntarily provides a statement confirming their free will to reside with their parents, as there is no evidence of unlawful detention.
The court's decision was based on the voluntary statement of the wife, indicating that she was not being illegally detained or kidnapped.
The court emphasized personal liberty and the individual's choice in residence, allowing a married woman to live with her spouse against parental concerns.
The expressed desire of the wife to reside with her husband and the absence of objection from her parents influenced the court's decision in allowing the habeas corpus petition.
A court cannot compel a person to return to an unwilling spouse; issues should be resolved in a competent forum.
The court can issue directions to enable the resumption of married life in a matrimonial dispute.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.