JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, `1996 Act') has been filed by the Petitioner-Information TV Pvt. Ltd. seeking appointment of an arbitrator in terms of Clause 6 of the Memorandum of Understanding (hereinafter, `MoU') dated 1st May, 2018. Clause 6 of the MoU reads as under:

"6. That MOU shall be construed in accordance with the laws in force in India and in the eventuality that any dispute or difference should arise on any matter relating to or arising out of the present MOU the same shall be settled by Arbitration and shall be referred to the Sole Arbitrator who shall be appointed by both parties mutually and whose decision shall be final and binding upon the parties. The Sole Arbitrator shall conduct the arbitration proceedings at New Delhi/Delhi. It is also agreed between the parties that arbitration proceeding would be conducted in English only and in no other language. Only appropriate Court at Delhi shall have jurisdiction to entertain the disputes that may arise out of this MOU. No other courts shall have jurisdiction."

3.