IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, Ravinder Dudeja, JJ.
Himanshu Goyal Proprietor of M/s Raj And Co. - Appellant
Versus
Principal Commissioner State Gst. Delhi & Anr. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 1199 of 2024
Decided On : 27-02-2024
GST Registration - Retrospective Cancellation - The court held that GST registration cannot be cancelled with retrospective effect mechanically and must be based on objective criteria. The cancellation with retrospective effect should only be done if the consequences are intended and warranted. The petitioner's registration was modified to be effective from the date of the Show Cause Notice, and the petitioner was directed to comply with the provisions of the Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner's GST registration was cancelled with retrospective effect, and the petitioner had closed the business. The Show Cause Notice and the order did not provide sufficient details and did not put the petitioner on notice of the retrospective cancellation.
Finding of the Court:
The court modified the impugned order to make the cancellation of registration effective from the date of the Show Cause Notice and directed the petitioner to comply with the provisions of the Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017.
Issues: Retrospective cancellation of GST registration, lack of notice regarding retrospective cancellation
Ratio Decidendi: GST registration cannot be cancelled with retrospective effect mechanically and must be based on objective criteria. The cancellation with retrospective effect should only be done if the consequences are intended and warranted.
Final Decision: The impugned order was modified to make the cancellation of registration effective from the date of the Show Cause Notice, and the petitioner was directed to comply with the provisions of the Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017.
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral) - Petitioner impugns order dated 12.10.2022, whereby, the GST Registration of the Petitioner has been cancelled with effect from 08.06.2018 i.e. retrospective date.
2. Petitioner was in the business of trading of household edible items and had obtained the GST Registration.
3. As per the petitioner, petitioner closed his business in June 2022. Subject Show Cause Notice dated 18.07.2022 was issued on the ground that the petitioner had not filed the returns. Petitioner was called upon to file a reply and appear for personal hearing on the appointed date and time.
4. Show Cause Notice shows that there was no date, time or venue mentioned where the petitioner had to appear pursuant to the Show Cause Notice. The Show Cause Notice does not even bear the name and designation of the Officer issuing the Show Cause Notice and merely bears the digital signature signed by D.S. Goods & Services Tax Network (4).
5. The impugned order cancelling the registration dated 12.10.2022 begins with a reference to a reply dated 27.07.2022 and then states that no reply to notice to show cause has been submitted and the effective date of cancellation is 08.06.2018. The notice thereafter records that the petitioner has to pay the amounts mentioned in the notice on or before 22.10.2022. However, the amounts mentioned are 0.0 i.e. Nil.
6. In terms of Section 29(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the proper officer may cancel the GST registration of a person from such date including any retrospective date, as he may deem fit if the circumstances set out in the said sub-section are satisfied. Registration cannot be cancelled with retrospective effect mechanically. It can be cancelled only if the proper officer deems it fit to do so. Such satisfaction cannot be subjective but must be based on some objective criteria. Merely, because a taxpayer has not filed the returns for some period does not mean that the taxpayer's registration is required to be cancelled with retrospective date also covering the period when the returns were filed and the taxpayer was compliant.
7. It is important to note that, according to the respondent, one of the consequences for cancelling a tax payer's registration with retrospective effect is that the taxpayer's customers are denied the input tax credit availed in respect of the supplies made by the tax payer during such period. Although, we do not consider it apposite to examine this aspect but assuming that the respondent's contention in this regard is correct, it would follow that the proper officer is also required to consider this aspect while passing any order for cancellation of GST registration with retrospective effect. Thus, a taxpayer's registration can be cancelled with retrospective effect only where such consequences are intended and are warranted.
8. Further, Show Cause Notice dated 18.07.2022 and order dated 12.10.2022 does not put the petitioner to notice that the registration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively. Accordingly, petitioner had no opportunity to even object to the retrospective cancellation of the registration.
9. Clearly, the impugned notice and impugned order are bereft of any detail and are thus not sustainable. However, in the instant case, the case of the petitioner is that petitioner has himself shut the business since June 2022 and is no longer interested in the restoration of the GST registration.
10. Both the petitioner as well as the respondent want cancellation of GST registration, however, for different reasons. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 12.10.2022 is modified to the effect that the cancellation of registration shall be effective from 18.07.2022 i.e. the date of the Show Cause Notice on which date the registration was also suspended.
11. The petitioner shall however comply with the provisions of Section 29 of the Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 and file all necessary details as mandated by the Act.
12. It is clarified that Re
GST registration cannot be cancelled with retrospective effect mechanically and must be based on objective criteria. The cancellation with retrospective effect should only be done if the consequences....
Cancellation of GST registration with retrospective effect must be based on objective criteria and intended consequences, and cannot be done mechanically.
Cancellation of GST registration with retrospective effect requires objective criteria and consideration of consequences, and must be in accordance with the law and after providing an opportunity of ....
Cancellation of GST registration with retrospective effect should be based on objective criteria and consider the consequences of retrospective cancellation.
Cancellation of GST registration with retrospective effect should be based on objective criteria and warranted consequences, and the respondents are not precluded from taking steps for recovery of an....
GST registration cannot be cancelled with retrospective effect mechanically and must be based on objective criteria. Cancellation with retrospective effect should only occur when intended consequence....
Cancellation of GST registration with retrospective effect must be based on objective criteria and intended consequences, not merely due to non-filing of returns.
GST registration cannot be cancelled with retrospective effect mechanically and must be based on objective criteria.
Cancellation of GST registration with retrospective effect requires objective criteria and consideration of consequences, not solely based on the failure to file returns.
Cancellation of GST registration with retrospective effect must be based on objective criteria and proper reasoning.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.