SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 525

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, Ravinder Dudeja, JJ.
Amar Enterprises Through Its Proprietor - Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Delhi Goods And Services Tax & Anr. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 3182 of 2024 & CM. APPLS. 13113-14 of 2024
Decided On : 04-03-2024

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Rakesh Kumar and Mr. P.K. Gambhir, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, ASC with Ms. Samridhi Vats, Advocate, for the Respondents.

IMPORTANT POINT
GST registration cannot be cancelled with retrospective effect mechanically and must be based on objective criteria. Cancellation with retrospective effect should only occur when intended consequences are warranted.

Headnote:

GST Registration - Retrospective Cancellation - Objective Criteria for Cancellation

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner's GST registration was cancelled retrospectively with effect from 03.07.2017 due to failure to file returns for a continuous period of six months. The petitioner had no opportunity to object to the retrospective cancellation, and the impugned order did not provide reasons for the cancellation.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the retrospective cancellation lacked proper reasoning and details, and it cannot be sustained. The court modified the impugned order to cancel the registration with effect from the date of the Show Cause Notice, as the petitioner no longer sought to continue the business.

Issues: The issues revolved around the retrospective cancellation of GST registration, lack of reasons provided in the impugned order, and the petitioner's cessation of business activities.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that GST registration cannot be cancelled with retrospective effect mechanically and must be based on objective criteria. It also highlighted that cancellation with retrospective effect should only occur when intended consequences are warranted.

Final Decision: The court modified the impugned order to cancel the registration with effect from the date of the Show Cause Notice and allowed the respondents to take steps for recovery of any tax, penalty, or interest due in accordance with the law.

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)

1. Petitioner impugns order dated 08.08.2023, whereby the GST registration of the petitioner has been cancelled retrospectively with effect from 03.07.2017. Petitioner also impugns Show Cause Notice dated 29.10.2021.

2. Vide Show Cause Notice dated 29.10.2021, petitioner was called upon to show cause as to why the registration be not cancelled for the following reason:

    "Any taxpayer other than composition taxpayer has not filed returns for a continuous period of six months"

3. Petitioner is a proprietorship firm engaged in retail and wholesale of paper, corrugated paper and paperboard and possessed GST registration.

4. Show Cause Notice dated 29.10.2021 was issued to the Petitioner seeking to cancel its registration on the ground "any taxpayer other than composition taxpayer has not filed returns for a continuous period of six months". The said Show Cause Notice does not put the petitioner to notice that the registration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively. Accordingly, the petitioner had no opportunity to even object to the retrospective cancellation of the registration.

5. Thereafter, the impugned order dated 08.08.2023 passed on the Show Cause Notice dated 29.10.2021 does not give any reasons for cancellation of registration. It merely states, "Whereas no reply to the show cause notice has been submitted and whereas, the undersigned based on record available with this office is of the opinion that your registration is liable to be cancelled for following reason(s): Section 29(2)(c)- Person, other than paying tax u/s 10 failed to furnish returns for prescribed periods".

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is no longer interested in continuing the business and has closed down all business activities.

7. Further, he submits that the registration of the petitioner was cancelled by Impugned Order dated 11.08.2021 with effect from 30.06.2020. Pursuant to the said impugned order, an application seeking revocation of cancellation dated 01.09.2021 was filed by the petitioner whereby the registration was restored. Thereafter, subject Show Cause Notice dated 29.10.2021 was issued and by the impugned order dated 08.08.2023, it was once again cancelled retrospectively with effect from 03.07.2017 on the ground of "Section 29(2)(c)- Person, other than paying tax u/s 10 failed to furnish returns for prescribed periods".

8. We notice that the impugned Show Cause Notice and the impugned order are also bereft of any details and accordingly the same cannot be sustained. Neither the impugned Show Cause Notice, nor the impugned order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation.

9. In terms of Section 29(2) of the Act, the proper officer may cancel the GST registration of a person from such date including any retrospective date, as he may deem fit if the circumstances set out in the said sub-section are satisfied. Registration cannot be cancelled with retrospective effect mechanically. It can be cancelled only if the proper officer deems it fit to do so. Such satisfaction cannot be subjective but must be based on some objective criteria. Merely, because a taxpayer has not filed the returns for some period does not mean that the taxpayer's registration is required to be cancelled with retrospective date also covering the period when the returns were filed, and the taxpayer was compliant.

10. It is important to note that, according to the respondent, one of the consequences for cancelling a taxpayer's registration with retrospective effect is that the taxpayer's customers are denied the input tax credit availed in respect of the supplies made by the taxpayer during such period. Although, we do not consider it apposite to examine this aspect but assuming that the respondent's contention in required to consider this aspect while passing any order for cancellation of GST registration with retrospective effect. Thus, a taxpayer's registration can be cancelled with retrospective effect on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top