NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Pradeep Kumar Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
Shri Praveen Aggarwal & Others – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Neena Bansal Krishna, J.
I.A. 7134/2023 (under Section 151 read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act filed by the plaintiff for condonation of delay in filing the Chamber Appeal)
1. An application has been filed on behalf of defendant No.5 seeking condonation of delay of 752 days in filing the Chamber Appeal O.A.39/2023 against the Orders dated 18.03.2021 and 09.05.2022.
2. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 752 days in filing the Chamber Appeal is condoned.
3. The application is allowed and is disposed of accordingly.
O.A. 39/2023 (under Rule 5 Chapter 2 of the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rule 2018 read with Section 151 CPC against the Order dated 18.03.2021 and 09.05.2022)
4. A Chamber Appeal has been filed under Rule 5 Chapter 2 of the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as "CPC, 1908") against the Orders dated 18.03.2021 and 09.05.2022 passed by the learned Joint Registrar closing the right of defendant No.5/Smt. Usha Bansal to file the Written Statement to the Amended plaint and proceeding ex-parte against defendant No.5, respectively.
5. The defendant No.5 h
Naimat Kaur Anand Vs. Decon Company
National Small Industries Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Thermosetting Industrial Products
New Bank of India Vs. Marvels (India)
Salem Advocate Bar Assn. (II) v. Union of India
Land Acquisition, Anantnag and Another v. Mst. Katiji and Others
Esha Bhattacharjee v. Raghunathpur Nafar Academy
Deptt. of Horticulture v. Raghu Raj
Ram Sarup Lugani v. Nirmal Lugani
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.