IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
V. Kameswar Rao, Saurabh Banerjee, JJ.
Sgt Muralidhar Pakal Af Fit - Appellant
Versus
Union of India And Others - Respondent
W.P.(C) 7502 of 2023, C.M.APPLs. 29106 of 2023, 54125 of 2023 & 10230 of 2024
Decided On : 20-02-2024
IAF - Discharge Order - AFO 33/2017 - The court discussed the mandatory provisions of AFO 33/2017, emphasizing the requirement for seeking prior permission and NOC for joining a civil post. The court upheld the rejection of the petitioner's application, citing non-compliance with the mandatory provisions and the precedent set by previous judgments.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, an Airman in the Indian Air Force, applied for a post in the Government of Orissa without seeking permission as required under AFO 33/2017. His subsequent applications for NOC and Discharge Order were rejected, leading to the filing of the present petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of AFO 33/2017 and upheld the rejection of his application for NOC and Discharge Order.
Issues: Non-compliance with AFO 33/2017, rejection of NOC and Discharge Order, and the requirement for seeking prior permission for joining a civil post.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the mandatory nature of the provisions in AFO 33/2017 and upheld the rejection of the petitioner's application based on non-compliance with the prescribed procedures.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, and the court upheld the rejection of the petitioner's application for NOC and Discharge Order.
JUDGMENT
Saurabh Banerjee, J. (Oral) - The facts before this Court are that the petitioner, after enrolling in the Indian Air Force [Hereinafter referred to as `IAF'] as an Airman on 27.12.2005 for a period of 20 years, had applied for a post in the Government of Orissa through the Odisha Civil Services Examination, 2020 advertised on 31.12.2020 through the IAF website on 16.01.2021.
2. Interestingly, the petitioner, despite facing rejection thereto on the ground that he did not possess the Skill Grade `A' as required under the prescribed rules, first appeared in the preliminary examination on 27.08.2021 and then in the written examination between 20.01.2022 and 02.02.2022 as well, albeit, without seeking permission as required under AFO 33/2017. In fact, after clearing, he appeared for the interview on 24.09.2022 and got selected for a Gazette post in Group B service of the Odisha Government on 07.10.2022.
3. It was under the aforesaid circumstances that the petitioner approached the competent authority for grant of a No Objection Certificate [Hereinafter referred to as `NOC'] and Discharge Order for discharge from service to join the appointed post vide two separate applications, which were rejected by the Air Force Record Office [Hereinafter referred to as `AFRO'] vide order dated 16.12.2022.
4. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner filed O.A. No.216/2023 seeking quashing of order dated 16.12.2022 as also for directing the respondents to issue NOC and Discharge Order.
5. The learned Armed Forces Tribunal [Hereinafter referred to as `AFT'], vide order dated 25.01.2023, initially directed the respondents to issue a provisional NOC to the petitioner for joining the civil service in view of the order dated 23.03.2022 passed by the AFT in O.A. 2670/2021 titled Cpl Ayush Maurya v. Union of India and Ors. which held that the rejection of an application on account of lack of Skill Grade `A' was improper, and also directed the petitioner to apply to the respondents for discharge, whereafter, his application was dismissed by the Group Captain Personnel Airmen vide order dated 07.03.2023.
6. Thereafter, the learned AFT dismissed O.A. 216/2023 vide its impugned order dated 19.04.2023 holding, inter-alia, as under:
a. The provision of seeking prior permission under AFO 33/2017 is an important ingredient and is a mandatory requirement for seeking discharge for joining a civil post.
b. Even if the request of the petitioner to apply online and to participate in the selection process was rejected on account of the website not being updated in the view of the condition of possessing Skill Grade `A' being struck off, which cannot be attributed to the petitioner, the mandate of AFO 33/2017 warranting intimation and seeking NOC after declaration of result of written test and on receipt of interview call letter is a mandatory provision, which was not complied with by the petitioner.
c. There is no reason or justification given by the petitioner for the non compliance and violation of the mandatory provisions under Clause 11 and 12 of AFO 33/2017.
d. Relying upon the judgement passed by this Court in CPL Manoranjan Kumar v. Union of India, 2017 SCC OnLine Del 11865 holding that a member of the IAF must apply and comply with the rules, more so as they are part of a disciplined force, the failure of the petitioner to do so warrants rejection of his petition.
7. Faced with the above, the petitioner has filed the present petition seeking quashing and setting aside of the impugned orders dated 19.04.2023, 07.03.2023 and 16.12.2022 rejecting the grant of NOC and Discharge Order; as also directing the respondents to issue a NOC and Discharge Order to him to enable him to join the civil service; and further to direct the respondents nos. 7 and 8 i.e., The Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Government of Odisha and The Chief Secretary, GA & PG (General Administration and Public Grievances) Department, Government of Odisha respectivel
Compliance with mandatory provisions of AFO 33/2017 is essential for seeking NOC and Discharge Order for joining a civil post.
Compliance with AFO 33/2017 requirements for seeking permission to apply for a civil post is mandatory for air force personnel.
The arbitrary nature of the condition of possessing Skill Grade 'A' and the lack of necessity for the IAF to retain the petitioner influenced the court's decision to issue mandamus for the grant of N....
An employee possesses an inherent right to resign from service, which cannot be unilaterally denied by the employer based on groundless assertions of staff shortage or operational exigencies absent s....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the resignation of a member of the CRPF should not be accepted hastily, disregarding the mandatory notice period, and the appointing authority....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.