SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 616

RAJIV SHAKDHER, AMIT BANSAL
Gurpreet Kaur Gujral – Appellant
Versus
Portrucks Equipment Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr Naman Garg, Advocate, for the Appellants.
None, for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

Rajiv Shakdher, J. (Oral)

CM Appl.11748-49/2024

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

RFA(COMM) 70/2024 & CM Appls.11746-47/2024

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 13.10.2023 passed by the District Judge, Commercial-03, South-East, Saket Court, Delhi.

3. Respondent no.1/plaintiff had filed the suit for recovery of security deposit paid to the appellant/defendant no.1 concerning tenanted premises described as Unit No.DPT008, DLF Prime Towers, D Block, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-1, New Delhi [hereafter referred to as the "suit property"].

4. The record shows that the disputants executed two lease deeds. The first lease deed was executed on 28.09.2017 [in short, "first lease deed"]. This lease deed, even according to the appellant/defendant, was unregistered, although it had a tenure of five (05) years.

5. Concededly, the disputants also entered into a second lease deed immediately thereafter, i.e., on 10.10.2017 [in short, "second lease deed"]. The second lease deed was executed for 11 months, commencing from 01.10.2017.

6. It is not disputed by the appellant/defendant that respondent no.1/plaintiff h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top