Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
REKHA PALLI
Siddhanth Mendiratta – Appellant
Versus
Madhu Chawla – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details about the tenancy and suit property (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defendant's arguments regarding entitlement to occupy (Para 3) |
| 3. trial court's analysis on the basis of admissions (Para 4) |
| 4. appellant's objections to trial court's findings (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 5. respondent's position and counterarguments (Para 8) |
| 6. court's reasoning in favor of respondents (Para 9 , 10) |
| 7. final dismissal of appellant's claim (Para 11) |
| 8. appeal outcome and future proceedings (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT
Rekha Palli, J. (Oral)--The present regular first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter, CPC) seeks to assail the judgment and decree dated 10.11.2021 passed by the learned ADJ in CS (DJ) No. 803 of 2019. Vide the impugned judgment, the learned Trial Court has decreed the suit of the respondents/plaintiffs for possession by allowing the respondents' application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC and has directed the appellant to handover the vacant possession of the suit property being Shop no. G-19, Vishwa Sadan, District Centre, Janakpuri, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as `the suit property')
2. The suit property was initially let out by the respondents in favour of the a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
