SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 624

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Gautam Rawal – Appellant
Versus
Garima Rawal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
In person with Mr. G.C. Rawal, Advocate, for the Appellant.
None, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Suresh Kumar Kait, J. - The present appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 has been preferred by the appellant-husband against the judgment dated 29.11.2022 passed by the learned Family Court, Delhi in (HMA OLDNO.325/2016 AND NEW NO.1353/2018), whereby his petition under Section 13(1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking divorce from respondent-wife, was dismissed.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the marriage between the appellant-husband and respondent-wife was solemnised on 06.05.2011 as per Hindu Rites and Ceremonies and a son was born out of the said wedlock on 01.01.2023.

3. The appellant in the present appeal has alleged that his marriage has been strained right from its inception due to respondent's indifference/disrespect towards him and his family. He alleged that the respondent was of quarrelsome nature and was not cooperative, as she neither participated in the day-to-day chores nor contributed financially to the house-hold expenses despite being employed. He claims that the respondent often acted as per her whims and fancies and used to spend more time at her maternal home. It is evident from the fact that out of a total of four yea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top