IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Subramonium Prasad, J.
Sunny Sachdeva - Appellant
Versus
Acp (North) , Rti Cell & Anr. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 10436 of 2022
Decided On : 12-03-2024
RTI Act - Information Disclosure - Section 6 - 19(1) - 19(3) - 20 - The court discussed the provisions of the RTI Act, including Section 6, 19(1), 19(3), and 20, and their application in the case. It highlighted the requirement for providing true and correct information, the appeal process, penalties for non-disclosure, and the need for departmental action against officials responsible for incorrect information.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Central Information Commission for not providing true and correct information in response to his RTI applications. The petitioner sought punishment against the respondents for failure to provide accurate information.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that true and correct replies were eventually provided to the petitioner, and departmental actions were initiated against the officials responsible for the error. It concluded that there was no need for imposing a monetary penalty against the personnel under Section 20(1) of the RTI Act.
Issues: The main issue was the failure to provide accurate information in response to the RTI applications, and the petitioner's demand for penalties under Section 20 of the RTI Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that penalties should only be imposed if there is a mala fide in providing incorrect, incomplete, or misleading information without reasonable cause. It also highlighted the provision for departmental action against the concerned officer(s) under the applicable service rules.
Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of, and the court observed that if the petitioner is dissatisfied with the replies, he can avail of the remedies provided under the RTI Act.
JUDGMENT
1. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 24.02.2022 passed by the Central Information Commission and to provide true, correct and proper information to the petitioner to his RTI Applications No. 1447/2020 and No. 1453/2020 dated 19.05.2020 and 21.05.2020. The petitioner has also sought punishment against the respondents for failure in providing true and correct information in response to the abovementioned RTI Applications.
2. The facts, in brief, leading to the filing of the instant writ petition are as follows:
i. A quarrel broke-out between the Petitioner, his wife and one Vikas Tiwari on 27.02.2020 in-front of Hanuman Mandir near Police Booth Hardev Nagar, Burari owing to which he made a call on the police helpline 112 to seek assistance.
ii. The petitioner thereafter filed 4 RTI Applications under Section 6 of the RTI Act with the Public Information Officer, Police Control Room dated 19.05.2020 and 21.05.2020 seeking the following information:
i. RTI Application No. 1447/2020 dated 19.05.2020.
The following information was sought regarding calls made on Police Helpline 112 from the mobile numbers 9990090890 and 7503323332 between 9:15 and 9:30 PM on 27.02.2020
a. Forms filled in the CPCR regarding the above said call
b. Action Taken Against the accused person
c. All information received or taken from the victim
d. Whether any information has been received by the IO from other departments regarding the treatment of the victims
ii. RTI Application No. 1453/2020 dated 21.05.2020
The following information was sought regarding calls made on Police Helpline Number 112 from the mobile numbers 9990090890 and 7503323332 between 9 PM and 10 PM in 27.02.2020
a. Forms filled in the CPCR regarding the call
b. Whether proper treatment was given to the victim
c. If any CCTV footage was collected as Evidence
d. Amount of Police officials present in Hardev Nagar Police Booth Between 9-10PM
iii. RTI Application No. 1454/2020 dated 21.05.2020.
Information was sought regarding call made on the Police Helpline Number 112 from the mobile numbers of the petitioner between 11:30 PM to 12:00 AM on the intervening night of 18.10.2019 about public nuisance at B-26, Hardev Nagar, Burari.
iv. RTI Application No. 1455/2020 dated 21.05.2020
Information was sought regarding DD No. 35B dated 24.09.2019 related to encroachment of public streets in Burari.
iii. The PIO, North District, Civil Lines replied to the RTI Applications No. 1447/2020 and No. 1453/2020 vide reply dated 19.06.2020 and 22.06.2020 respectively stating the following
i. No PCR Call was received from the PS Wazirabad from either of the mobile numbers.
ii. Further information was sought from ACP Timarpur which revealed that one call was received from the Mobile Number 7503323332, and a challan was traced from that number, details of which were provided to the petitioner.
iii. It was also stated that no call was received from the mobile Number 9990090890
iv. Dissatisfied with the reply of the PIO, the petitioner preferred an appeal under Section 19(1) of the RTI Act to both the replies dated 19.06.2020 and 22.06.2020 in front of the Dy. Commissioner of Police, North East.
v. The First Appellate Authority/Dy. Commissioner vide orders dated 02.11.2020 disposed of Appeal No. 221/2020/Appeal/RTI/North District w.r.t. RTI Application dated 19.05.2020 and Appeal No. 222/2020/Appeal/RTI/North District w.r.t. RTI Application dated 21.05.2020 and remanded both the RTI Applications back to the PIO to provide a fresh reply to the petitioner.
vi. Aggrieved by the orders of the First Appellate Authority, the petitioner filed a second appeal under Section 19(3) of the RTI Act dated 10.12.2020 before the Ld. Central Information Commission.
vii. During the pendency of the second appeal before the Ld. CIC, additional information was obtained from the SHO, Wazirabad which was duly forwarded to the petitioner by ACP, Timarpur vide letter dated 14.12.
The main legal point established is that penalties under Section 20 of the RTI Act should only be imposed in cases of mala fide non-disclosure or misleading information without reasonable cause, and ....
Imposition of penalties under Section 20(1) of the RTI Act requires the existence of mala fide, deliberate denial, or contumacious conduct; procedural lapses or technical misunderstandings, if addres....
PIO liable for penalty under S.20(1) RTI Act for delayed, incorrect responses and non-compliance with directions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.