MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Deepak Nagar – Appellant
Versus
State And Anr – Respondent
JUDGMENT (Oral)
1. By way of present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks setting aside of the order dated 24.11.2022 passed by learned M.M. (NI Act), Digital Court-03, South East District, Saket, vide which he has been summoned to face trial in Complaint Case NI Act 4900/2022, arising out of proceedings initiated under Sections 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereafter, `NI Act').
2. The only contention canvassed on behalf of the petitioner is that legal notice was not issued to him within the period of 30 days as prescribed in Section 138 proviso (b), NI Act. In support of his submissions that the said period is not extendable, learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to Section 138 of the NI Act as well as demand notice and the pre-summoning evidence placed on record.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 however, has contested the petition by submitting that the issue as to whether the demand notice was issued within or beyond the period of 30 days is a matter of trial.
4. Briefly stated, the facts necessary for the consideration of the present petition are that in its complaint, complainant/respondent No. 2 has alleged that the pe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.