IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Mr. Hreesh Kenth & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
State & Ors. - Respondents
TEST.CAS. 19 of 2023 & I.A. 6486 of 2024
Decided On : 19-03-2024
Indian Succession Act - Grant of Probate - Section 276 - Immovable Assets, Movable Assets - [Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925] - The court granted probate in respect of the Will dated 19th January, 2012 of Smt. Raj Kumari Kenth in favor of the beneficiaries in the terms of the petition.
Fact of the Case:
The petition sought grant of probate under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for the last and final Will of late Smt. Raj Kumari Kenth. The Will bequeathed all movable and immovable properties equally to her six sons, with no share for her daughters.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the Will was not contested, and all legal heirs had given their no objection to the grant of probate. The Court perused the notarized copy of the Will, affidavits of no objection, and valuation reports, and granted probate in favor of the beneficiaries.
Issues: The main issue was the grant of probate for the Will of Smt. Raj Kumari Kenth, and the traceability of certain bank accounts mentioned in the Will.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court's decision was influenced by the lack of contest in respect of the Will, the no objection from all legal heirs, and the valuation reports. The Court also considered the settled legal position that in uncontested Will cases, evidence by the parties is not compulsory.
Final Decision: The Court granted probate in respect of the Will dated 19th January, 2012 of Smt. Raj Kumari Kenth in favor of the beneficiaries, and allowed the application for the same.
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 seeks grant of probate in respect of the last and final Will of late Smt. Raj Kumari Kenth (`Testatrix') dated 19th January, 2012. The t estatrix was married to late Shri. Sohan Lal Kenth and had eight children - named below:
(i) Mr. Tirath Ram Kenth (son) (Petitioner No. 2)
(ii) Mr. Hreesh Kenth (son) (Petitioner No. 1)
(iii) Mr. Permosh Lal Kenth (son) (Respondent No. 2)
(iv) Mr. Kishore Kumar Kenth (son) (Respondent No. 3)
(v) Late Mr. Pradeep Kumar Kenth (son)
(vi) Mr. Pawan Kenth (son) (Respondent No. 4)
(vii) Mrs. Sheila Devi Kambo (daughter) (Respondent No. 5)
(viii) Mrs. Leela Suman Taheem (daughter) (Respondent No. 6)
3. The Will dated 19th January, 2012 has been placed on record. The various movable and immovable properties which were owned by her are mentioned in paragraphs 4 and 6 of the petition which are set out below:
"Immovable Assets
(i) Freehold commercial-cum-residential property bearing no. R4, measuring 408 square yards, situated at Green Park, New Delhi, India (having built up area of approx. 7000 square feet building);
(ii) Leasehold commercial premises bearing no. 212, measuring 689 square feet, situated Ansal Chambers, 6 Bikaji Cama Place, Delhi, India;
(iii) 50% share in the freehold premises bearing no. 215, measuring 250 square yards, situated in Sector 6, Panchkula, Haryana, India (2 storey building, having built up area of 2000 square feet); and
(iv) Freehold premises bearing no. A-2901, measuring 410 square yards, situated in Greenfields, Faridabad, India."
Movable Assets
"(i) NRE Fixed Deposit Account bearing no. 1994.103.2453 held with Canara Bank, branch at 16, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi-110001;
(ii) NRO Savings Account bearing no. 1994.407.743 held with Canara Bank, branch at 16, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi - 110001;
(iii) NRO Savings Account bearing no. 1994.407.847 held with Canara Bank, branch at 16, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi - 110001;
(iv) NRE Fixed Deposit Account bearing no. 0988.303.000.8350 held with Oriental Bank at Sector 11, Panchkula, Haryana;
(v) NRE Fixed Deposit Account bearing no. 2488.300.003.275 held with Bank of Baroda at SCO 22, Sector 11, Panchkula 134109, Haryana;
(vi) NRO Savings Account bearing no. 2488.300.003.276 held with Bank of Baroda at SCO 22, Sector 11, Panchkula 134109, Haryana;
(vii) NRO Savings Account bearing no. 2488.010.000.5905 held with Bank of Baroda at SCO 22, Sector 11, Panchkula 134109, Haryana;
(viii) Savings Account bearing no. 602.001.010.009.816 held with Vijaya Bank at Ansal Chamber 2, Flat No. Ug 27/35, 6 Africa Avenue, Bikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110066;
(ix) Fixed Deposit dated 9 March 2010 held with State Bank of Patiala, Branch No. 0387 situated at House No. 199, Sector 7, Panchkula, Haryana maturing on 9 March 2012;
(x) Fixed Deposit dated 28 March 2011 held with State Bank of Patiala, Branch No. 0387 situated at House No. 199, Sector 7, Panchkula, Haryana maturing on 28 March 2013; and
(xi) Savings account bearing no. 2488.030.000.3319 with Bank of Baroda at SCO 22, Sector 11, Panchkula 134109, Haryana jointly with Mr. Tirath Ram Kenth (Petitioner No. 2) and Mr. Hreesh Kenth (Petitioner No. 1)."
4. The testatrix passed away on 18th February, 2021. As per the Will, late Smt. Raj Kumari Kenth appointed two of her sons namely the Petitioners- Mr. Hreesh Kenth and Mr. Tirath Ram Kenth as the executors of her Will. Two of the Petitioners are the sons who are also the executors of the Will. Out of the remaining children, one son Mr. Pradeep Kumar Kenth has predeceased her on 2nd December, 2016. The remaining children are arrayed as Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 and the children of the pre-deceased son are arrayed as Respondent Nos. 7 and 8.
5. The Court has perused the notarised copy of the Will. As per the said Will, the testatrix has bequeathed all her movable and immovable properties equally in favour of her six sons. Th
The main legal point established in the judgment is the grant of probate under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, based on the uncontested nature of the Will and the no objection from al....
Partition suits are non-maintainable without impleading all necessary legal heirs. Probate applications remain valid even years after the testator's death, as the right to prove a Will is a continuou....
The jurisdiction for probate applications lies where the testator last resided, irrespective of the location of their property, underscoring the importance of residence in jurisdictional determinatio....
The court affirmed the validity of a Will under the Indian Succession Act when supported by evidence of attesting witnesses, confirming the executor's authority despite the death of a co-petitioner.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to prove the sound and disposing state of the testator's mind and his signature as required by law, and the need to remove all susp....
Proof of a Will does not require strict evidence of death; credible testimony and circumstantial evidence can suffice to establish validity and execution, emphasizing substantial justice in probate p....
The law is well settled that conscience of Court must be satisfied that Will in question was not only executed and attested in manner required under Act, 1925 but should also be found that said Will ....
The court established that the unchallenged testimony of the Executor is sufficient to prove the authenticity of a Will, supporting the grant of Probate even in the face of opposition from other lega....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.