Back
NAVIN CHAWLA
Param Preet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Navin Chawla, J. (Oral) - These petitions have been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, `Cr.P.C.') challenging the Order dated 24.12.2019 (hereinafter referred to as the `Impugned Order') passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-02, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the `ASJ') in Criminal Revision Petitions No.111/2019 and 112/2019, both titled Sunil Kumar Dahiya & Anr. v. State & Anr. (hereinafter collectively referred to as the `Revision Petitions'), allowing the said Revision Petitions.
2. The only facts relevant to note herein are that the summons in the complaint cases filed by the petitioner herein, being CC nos. 469870/2016 and 475877/2016, both titled Param Preet Singh v. VCORP Developments Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. (hereinafter collectively referred to as the `Complaint Cases'), filed by the petitioner herein against the respondent nos.2 to 4 herein, under Section 138 read with Sections 141 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short, `NI Act') were issued to the respondent nos.2 to 4 by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate-02 (NI Act), South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi (herein
The court emphasized that no useful purpose would be served in keeping alive a complaint, which is otherwise not maintainable.
The importance of providing both parties with an opportunity to be heard in revision petitions and expediting the hearing process.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the prohibition against filing a second revision petition under the garb of Section 482 CrPC, as well as the need for expeditious disposal of cases....
Accused must show willingness to pay interest and costs to be considered for discharge under Section 138 of the NI Act.
The court affirmed that changes in a complainant company's name do not invalidate pending legal actions under Section 138 of the N.I. Act; the High Court's jurisdiction under Article 227 is limited t....
Section 397 of Cr.P.C., is attracted against all orders except interlocutory orders, even mere availability of alternative remedy cannot be a ground to dis-entitlement of relief under section 482 of ....
The technical nature of the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. act, the inbuilt defences available to the accused, and the summary trial procedure were central legal principles established in the ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
