RAJIV SHAKDHER, AMIT BANSAL
Sanjay Kumar Baranwal – Appellant
Versus
Bhavna Kumari – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Amit Bansal, J. - Both the appeals arise out of the same impugned order.
2. MAT.APP. (F.C.) 87/2019, has been filed by Mr Sanjay Kumar Baranwal (`Husband') seeking setting aside/modification of the impugned order dated 29th January, 2019, passed by the learned Judge, Family Courts, Dwarka, New Delhi (`Family Court') whereby the application filed by the Mrs Bhavna Kumari (`Wife') under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 (`HMA') was disposed of, directing the Husband to pay a cumulative sum of Rs.66,000/-per month (Rs.22,000/-each to the Wife and the two daughters) as pendente lite maintenance, until the disposal of the divorce petition filed by the Husband under Sections 13(1)(ia) of the HMA.
3. MAT.APP. (F.C.) 159/2019, has been filed by the Wife seeking enhancement of the interim maintenance from Rs.66,000/-per month to a sum of Rs.1,25,000/-per month.
4. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are set out hereinafter. The parties got married on 8th March 2000, as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. Two children were born from the said wedlock on 13th March 2001 and 15th April 2006 respectively. Disputes arose between the parties in March 2018, which resulted in multiple rounds
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.