SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 719

RAJIV SHAKDHER, AMIT BANSAL
Sanjay Kumar Baranwal – Appellant
Versus
Bhavna Kumari – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Hargovind Jha, Advocate along with Appellant in MAT.APP.(F.C.) 87 of 2019 & C.M. No. APPL. 13356 of 2019, C.M. APP. 407 of 2020, C.M. APP. 3144 of 2023, CM APPL. 42129 of 2023, CM APP. 50290 of 2023, CM APP. 50354 of 2023, CM APP. 50361 of 2023, CM APP. 50363 of 2023 & for the Respondent in MAT.APP. (F.C.) 159/2019 & C.M. No. APPL. 27111/2019.
Mr Rajnish Ranjan and Mr Shivansh Srivastava, Advocates, for the Respondent in MAT.APP.(F.C.) 87 of 2019 & C.M. No. APPL. 13356 of 2019, C.M. APP. 407 of 2020, C.M. APP. 3144 of 2023, CM APPL. 42129 of 2023, CM APP. 50290 of 2023, CM APP. 50354 of 2023, CM APP. 50361 of 2023, CM APP. 50363 of 2023 & for the Petitioner in MAT.APP. (F.C.) 159/2019 & C.M. No. APPL. 27111/2019.

JUDGMENT

Amit Bansal, J. - Both the appeals arise out of the same impugned order.

2. MAT.APP. (F.C.) 87/2019, has been filed by Mr Sanjay Kumar Baranwal (`Husband') seeking setting aside/modification of the impugned order dated 29th January, 2019, passed by the learned Judge, Family Courts, Dwarka, New Delhi (`Family Court') whereby the application filed by the Mrs Bhavna Kumari (`Wife') under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 (`HMA') was disposed of, directing the Husband to pay a cumulative sum of Rs.66,000/-per month (Rs.22,000/-each to the Wife and the two daughters) as pendente lite maintenance, until the disposal of the divorce petition filed by the Husband under Sections 13(1)(ia) of the HMA.

3. MAT.APP. (F.C.) 159/2019, has been filed by the Wife seeking enhancement of the interim maintenance from Rs.66,000/-per month to a sum of Rs.1,25,000/-per month.

4. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are set out hereinafter. The parties got married on 8th March 2000, as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. Two children were born from the said wedlock on 13th March 2001 and 15th April 2006 respectively. Disputes arose between the parties in March 2018, which resulted in multiple rounds

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top